Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF VERRERIE DE BIOT v. FRANCE
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2000. Cidrerie Ruwet SA v Cidre Stassen SA and HP Bulmer Ltd.
CASE OF CROCHARD AND SIX OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF MURŠIĆ v. CROATIAJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES SAJÓ, L ó PEZ GUERRA AND WOJTYCZEK
CASE OF TÜZEL v. TURKEY (No. 2)
CASE OF R.S. v. POLANDJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES NICOLAOU, WOJTYCZEK AND VEHABOVIĆ
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 4128/87 of 9 December 1987 laying down conditions for the entry of flue-cured Virginia type, light air-cured Burley type (including Burley hybrids), light air-cured Maryland type and fire-cured tobacco, falling within subheadings 2401 10 10 to 2401 10 49 and 2401 20 10 to 2401 20 49 of the combined nomenclature
Yankov v. Bulgaria
CASE OF CEVIZOVIC AGAINST GERMANY
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 May 1992. Claus Ramrath v Ministre de la Justice, and l'Institut des réviseurs d'entreprises.

Document text Analytics

CASE OF MIROSHNICHENKO AND GRABOVSKAYA v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 32551/03;33687/03 • ECHR ID: 001-71611

Document date: December 13, 2005

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 6

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

3 unique documents cited • j citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846