Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF ALEKSEY OVCHINNIKOV v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KOVLER
X. v. LUXEMBOURG
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2381/91 of 29 July 1991 amending, for the second time, Regulation (EEC) No 3926/90 fixing, for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, the total allowable catches for 1991 and certain conditions under which they may be fished
CASE OF X v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE JOÄŒIENÄ–
CASE OF FUNKE v. FRANCECONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MATSCHER CONCERNING PARAGRAPHS 41-44 OF THE JUDGMENT
CASE OF RUBINS AGAINST LATVIA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 198/2002 of 31 January 2002 fixing the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 9/2002
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1324/2004 of 19 July 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
CASE OF FÁBER v. HUNGARY
CASE OF HELDENBURG v. THE CZECH REPUBLICPARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE EICKE

Document text Analytics

CASE OF FREIMANIS AND LIDUMS v. LATVIA

Doc ref: 73443/01;74860/01 • ECHR ID: 001-72362

Document date: February 9, 2006

Inbound citations: 24
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

P4 unique documents citing • KD citations total to R paragraphs

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846