Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF KOÇ AND TAMBAŞ v. TURKEY
CASE OF HILLER v. AUSTRIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MOTOC
CANÈ AND OTHERS v. MALTA
CASE OF JANOSEVIC v. SWEDENPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CASADEVALL
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 October 2011. Finanzamt Deggendorf v Markus Stoppelkamp.
Council Regulation (EC) No 3286/94 of 22 December 1994 laying down Community procedures in the field of the common commercial policy in order to ensure the exercise of the Community's rights under international trade rules, in particular those established under the auspices of the World Trade Organization
Commission Regulation (EC) No 561/98 of 12 March 1998 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1281/1999 of 18 June 1999 laying down detailed rules implementing the entry price arrangements for grape juice and musts
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 401/2012 of 7 May 2012 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature
CASE OF IPSD AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

Document text Analytics

CASE OF KOZIK v. POLAND

Doc ref: 25501/02 • ECHR ID: 001-76455

Document date: July 18, 2006

Inbound citations: 4
•
Cited paragraphs: 1
•
Outbound citations: 4

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

p unique documents citing • z citations total to d paragraphs

Outbound citations

L unique documents cited • j citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846