Browsing history:

↳
HAÇİKOĞLU AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF ZARZYCKI v. POLANDJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES ZIEMELE AND KALAYDJIEVA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 236/2001 of 2 February 2001 amending the import duties in the cereals sector
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 702/86 of 5 March 1986 altering the export refunds on white sugar and raw sugar exported in the natural state
CASE OF DI DONATO AND OTHERS v. ITALYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LORENZEN JOINED BY JUDGES ROZAKIS AND CONFORTI
CASE OF OSMANOĞLU v. TURKEYJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES TÜRMEN, VAJIĆ AND STEINER
CASE OF SPANU v. ITALY
CASE OF RAZVOZZHAYEV v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE AND UDALTSOV v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KELLER
CASE OF PERKINS AND R. AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF STAFFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOMCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE COSTA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF CHERNYSHOV AND 11 OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 10415/02 • ECHR ID: 001-77052

Document date: September 28, 2006

Inbound citations: 3
•
Cited paragraphs: 2
•
Outbound citations: 8

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

a unique documents citing • w citations total to d paragraphs

Outbound citations

Q unique documents cited • u citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846