Browsing history:

↳
DAL and OTHERS v. TURKEY
Commission Regulation (EC) No 61/2003 of 15 January 2003 amending Annexes I and II to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90 laying down a Community procedure for the establishment of maximum residue limits of veterinary medicinal products in foodstuffs of animal origin (Text with EEA relevance)
MAMINASHVILI AND YUPITER, PP v. UKRAINE
WÓJCIK v. POLAND
BELİCE AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF ZUSTOVIĆ AGAINST CROATIA
BÉRES v. HUNGARY
Council Regulation (EC) No 1987/2005 of 2 December 2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of granular polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) originating in Russia and the People’s Republic of China
CASE OF PHOCAS v. FRANCEJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES FOIGHEL AND PALM
CASE OF STEININGER AGAINST AUSTRIA AND 1 OTHER CASE

Document text Analytics

CASE OF KOLOSENKO v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 40200/02 • ECHR ID: 001-80304

Document date: April 26, 2007

Inbound citations: 3
•
Cited paragraphs: 3
•
Outbound citations: 4

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

T unique documents citing • 6 citations total to g paragraphs

Outbound citations

J unique documents cited • U citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707