Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF POROWSKI AGAINST POLAND
CASE OF BLYUDIK v. RUSSIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE DEDOV
CASE OF OJOG AND OTHERS v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1690/78 of 18 July 1978 derogating from Regulation (EEC) No 1790/76 as regards the closing date for the lodging of crop declarations in respect of soya beans for the 1978/79 marketing year
CASE OF BONDAR AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
Commission Regulation (EC) No 748/2009 of 5 August 2009 on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance )
NINE CASES AGAINST TURKEY
Commission Regulation (EC) No 55/2002 of 11 January 2002 fixing the maximum export refund on wholly milled round grain, medium grain and long grain A rice to be exported to certain third countries in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2009/2001
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 16 October 1996. Raffaele de Santis v Commission of the European Communities.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 363/2001 of 22 February 2001 fixing the maximum export refund on oats in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 2097/2000

Document text Analytics

CASE OF KUSHOGLU v. BULGARIA

Doc ref: 48191/99 • ECHR ID: 001-80482

Document date: May 10, 2007

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 13

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

qb unique documents cited • FT citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846