Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF KAPEL v. POLANDJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE S HIRVELÄ AND BIANKU
CASE OF PŁACZKOWSKA v. POLANDJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE S HIRVELÄ AND BIANKU
Commission Regulation (EC) No 264/2004 of 16 February 2004 derogating from Regulation (EC) No 1503/96 on the detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 3072/95 with regard to import duties on rice
CASE OF KURA v. POLANDJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE S HIRVELÄ AND BIANKU
Commission Regulation (EC) No 504/2004 of 18 March 2004 applying a reduction coefficient to refund certificates for goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, as provided for by Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1520/2000
Commission Regulation (EC) No 559/2004 of 25 March 2004 fixing the export refunds on cereal-based compound feedingstuffs
CASE OF V.C.L. AND A.N. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF FOKAS v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 31206/02 • ECHR ID: 001-94458

Document date: September 29, 2009

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 8

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

7 unique documents cited • d citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707