Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF SUBICKA v. POLANDCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MIJOVIĆ
CASE OF KHATAYEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF VALIULIENĖ v. LITHUANIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE JOÄŒIENÄ–
Commission Regulation (EC) No 76/2002 of 17 January 2002 introducing prior Community surveillance of imports of certain iron and steel products covered by the ECSC and EC Treaties originating in certain third countries
Commission Regulation (EC) No 30/98 of 8 January 1998 supplementing the restructuring plan referred to in Regulation (EEC) No 1487/92 concerning flat-rate aid for sugar cane cultivation in the French overseas departments
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3392/81 of 27 November 1981 on the loss of licences and certificates and amending for the third time Regulation (EEC) No 3183/80 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of import and export licences and advance fixing certificates for agricultural products
CASE OF TSFAYO AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF GOSSA v. POLANDPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CASADEVALL
CASE OF HELDENBURG v. THE CZECH REPUBLICPARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE EICKE
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2430/93 of 1 September 1993 adapting the codes and descriptions of certain products listed in the Annex to Council Regulation (EEC) No 827/68 on the common organization of the market in certain products listed in Annex II to the Treaty

Document text Analytics

CASE OF TARNOWSKI AND OTHERS v. POLAND

Doc ref: 43939/07 • ECHR ID: 001-106451

Document date: September 27, 2011

Inbound citations: 0
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 12

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Outbound citations

v unique documents cited • I7 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846