Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF R.K. v. HUNGARYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE HÃœSEYNOV
CASE OF FALTER ZEITSCHRIFTEN GMBH v. AUSTRIA (No. 2)
X. v. the NETHERLANDS
Commission Regulation (EC) No 505/2001 of 14 March 2001 fixing the export refunds on olive oil
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 76/87 of 12 January 1987 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 197/2013 of 7 March 2013 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 80/2012 establishing the list of biological or chemical substances provided for in Article 53(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1186/2009 setting up a Community system of reliefs from custom duty
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 490/83 of 1 March 1983 correcting Regulation (EEC) No 449/83 with regard to the components used to calculate the differential amounts for colza, rape and sunflower seed
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 4 May 2005. Chum Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Judgment of the Court of 2 August 1993. Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic.
AFFAIRE PALIY c. RUSSIE

Document text Analytics

CASE OF VARAPNICKAITE-MAZYLIENE v. LITHUANIA

Doc ref: 20376/05 • ECHR ID: 001-108680

Document date: January 17, 2012

Inbound citations: 2
•
Cited paragraphs: 2
•
Outbound citations: 6

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

U unique documents citing • c citations total to C paragraphs

Outbound citations

b unique documents cited • q citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846