Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF GAYGUSUZ v. AUSTRIAPARTIALLY DISSENTI NG OPINION OF JUDGE MATSCHER
Commission Regulation ( EEC ) No 22/92 of 7 January 1992 concerning the stopping of fishing for plaice by vessels flying the flag of Belgium
CSIHA v. HUNGARY
VADEKHIN v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
ALLFREY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Commission Regulation (EC) No 671/2002 of 18 April 2002 fixing the maximum export refund on barley in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 1558/2001
Ari and Others v. Turkey
CASE OF STATHOUDAKI AND OTHERS v. GREECE
NOVRUZLU v. AZERBAIJAN and 5 other applications
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 993/78 of 17 May 1978 amending for the seventh time Regulation (EEC) No 2223/70 waiving the countervailing charge on imports of certain wines originating in and coming from certain third countries

Document text Analytics

CASE OF NECHTO v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 24893/05 • ECHR ID: 001-108749

Document date: January 24, 2012

Inbound citations: 33
•
Cited paragraphs: 13
•
Outbound citations: 24

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

ju unique documents citing • K2 citations total to 1p paragraphs

Outbound citations

hI unique documents cited • mL citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707