Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF RUSLAN YAKOVENKO v. UKRAINECONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE ZUPAN Č I Č
FOUR CASES AGAINST TURKEY (SEE APPENDIX) CONCERNING THE LACK OF INDEPENDENCE AND IMPARTIALITY OF THE STATE SECURITY COURTS ON ACCOUNT OF THE PRESENCE OF A MILITARY JUDGE ON THE BENCH
Commission Regulation (EC) No 145/2008 of 19 February 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 796/2004 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of cross-compliance, modulation and the integrated administration and control system provided for in Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers
CASE OF AMIHALACHIOAIE v. MOLDOVAPARTLY CONCURRING, PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LOUCAIDES
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 354/2013 of 18 April 2013 on changes of biocidal products authorised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council Text with EEA relevance
CASE OF REMLI v. FRANCEDISSENTIN G OPINION OF JUDGE LOPES ROCHA
CASE OF MOUZOUKIS v. GREECE

Document text Analytics

CASE OF KHISMATULLIN v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 33469/06 • ECHR ID: 001-148625

Document date: December 11, 2014

Inbound citations: 8
•
Cited paragraphs: 9
•
Outbound citations: 16

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

j unique documents citing • M citations total to q paragraphs

Outbound citations

Fp unique documents cited • Xb citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846