Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF MEDVEDYEV AND OTHERS AGAINST FRANCE
CASE OF YAREMENKO v. UKRAINE
CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOMJOINT DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES KARAKAÅž, WOJTYCZEK AND DEDOV
X. v. BELGIUM
Regulation (EC) No 998/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the animal health requirements applicable to the non-commercial movement of pet animals and amending Council Directive 92/65/EEC
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2955/85 of 22 October 1985 derogating in respect of the countries of the Association of South-East Asian Nations, of the countries of the Central American Common Market and the countries which have signed the Cartagena Agreement (Andean Group) from Regulation (EEC) No 3749/83 on the defintion of the concept of originating products for purposes of the application of tariff preferences granted by the European Economic Community in respect of certain products from developing countries
European Parliament and Council Directive 95/27/EC of 29 June 1995 amending Council Directive 86/662/EEC on the limitation of noise emitted by hydraulic excavators, rope-operated excavators, dozers, loaders and excavator- loaders
CASE OF BREZOVEC AGAINST CROATIA
CASE OF BĚLEŠ AND OTHERS AGAINST THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF DI BONAVENTURA AND 74 OTHER CASES AGAINST ITALY

Document text Analytics

CASE OF MILEUSNIĆ AND MILEUSNIĆ-ESPENHEIM v. CROATIA

Doc ref: 66953/09 • ECHR ID: 001-152655

Document date: February 19, 2015

Inbound citations: 4
•
Cited paragraphs: 4
•
Outbound citations: 22

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

C unique documents citing • m citations total to G paragraphs

Outbound citations

sd unique documents cited • mx citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846