Browsing history:

↳
M.A. FAYED, A. FAYED AND S. FAYED v. the UNITED KINGDOMPARTIALLY DISSENTING OPINION OF MR. C.L. ROZAKIS
CASE OF DURSUN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF SIMON v. FRANCE
CASE OF ACUN AND YUMAK v. TURKEY
CASE OF JOHN MURRAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOMPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PETTITI, JOINED BY JUDGE VALTICOS
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1117/2010 of 2 December 2010 concerning the authorisation of a preparation of citric acid, sorbic acid, thymol and vanillin as a feed additive for weaned piglets (holder of the authorisation Vetagro SpA) Text with EEA relevance
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 237/97 of 7 February 1997 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
CASE OF FELIX BLAU SP. Z O.O. v. POLAND
CASE OF TSUKANOV AND TORCHINSKIY v. RUSSIA
CASE OF SOBOLEV AND OTHERS AGAINST RUSSIA AND 5 OTHER CASES

Document text Analytics

CASE OF SARKÖZI AND MAHRAN v. AUSTRIA

Doc ref: 27945/10 • ECHR ID: 001-153319

Document date: April 2, 2015

Inbound citations: 3
•
Cited paragraphs: 2
•
Outbound citations: 13

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

i unique documents citing • C citations total to 5 paragraphs

Outbound citations

Ee unique documents cited • EV citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846