Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF SHCHIBORSHCH AND KUZMINA v. RUSSIA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 53/2008 of 22 January 2008 opening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas for wines originating in the Republic of Montenegro
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 58/87 of 9 January 1987 fixing the premiums to be added to the import levies on cereals, flour and malt
POKIS v. LATVIA
Regulation (EEC) No 166/73 of the Commission of 25 January 1973 fixing the refunds applicable to cereals and wheat or rye flour, groats and meal
CASE OF SÜSS v. GERMANY
CASE OF PARADISO AND CAMPANELLI v. ITALYJOINT PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGES RAIMONDI AND SPANO
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLANDDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE NUSSBERGER
CASE OF HOLY SYNOD OF THE BULGARIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH (METROPOLITAN INOKENTIY) AND OTHERS v. BULGARIAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KALAYDJIEVA
CASE OF PETRAKIDOU v. TURKEYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE BRATZA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF MAMCHUR v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 10383/09 • ECHR ID: 001-156388

Document date: July 16, 2015

Inbound citations: 3
•
Cited paragraphs: 2
•
Outbound citations: 17

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

u unique documents citing • c citations total to F paragraphs

Outbound citations

t6 unique documents cited • 8C citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846