Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF GALUASHVILI v. GEORGIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE TULKENS
CASE OF AKÇAY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF DIMO DIMOV AND OTHERS AGAINST BULGARIA
CASE OF KUZMIN v. RUSSIA
CASE OF MITROVA AND SAVIK v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
CASE OF BITTÓ AND OTHERS AGAINST SLOVAKIA AND 10 OTHER CASES
Commission Regulation (EC) No 205/2004 of 5 February 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 3175/94 laying down detailed rules of application for the specific arrangements for the supply of cereal products to the smaller Aegean islands and establishing the forecast supply balance
Commission Regulation (EU) No 17/2010 of 8 January 2010 amending Regulation (EC) No 690/2008 as regards the recognition of the Italian province of Venice as a protected zone in respect of Erwinia amylovora (Burr.) Winsl. et al .

Document text Analytics

CASE OF CHMIL v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 20806/10 • ECHR ID: 001-158139

Document date: October 29, 2015

Inbound citations: 5
•
Cited paragraphs: 3
•
Outbound citations: 10

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

6 unique documents citing • 5 citations total to Q paragraphs

Outbound citations

s0 unique documents cited • BR citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846