Browsing history:

↳
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 229/89 of 30 January 1989 fixing the amounts to be levied in the beef sector on products which left the United Kingdom during the week 9 to 15 January 1989
CASE OF VIDAL v. BELGIUMDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE THOR VILHJALMSSON
CASE OF D.P. & J.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOMSEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE ROZAKIS
CASE OF ASALYA v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING, PARTLY CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE SAJÓ
CASE OF ERMÉNYI v. HUNGARYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE K Ū RIS
CASE OF A.K. v. LIECHTENSTEIN
CASE OF TAUTKUS v. LITHUANIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PINTO DE ALBUQUERQUE
COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2892/93 of 21 October 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1729/92 laying down detailed implementing rules for the specific measures for supplying the Canary Islands with products from the eggs and poultrymeat sectors, regarding the amounts of aid
CASE OF CHANKAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF REMLI v. FRANCEDISSE NTING OPINION OF JUDGE PETTITI

Document text Analytics

CASE OF KOVALENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 36299/03;14222/04;15030/04;36581/04;1407/05;2071/05;24618/05 • ECHR ID: 001-159040

Document date: December 8, 2015

Inbound citations: 4
•
Cited paragraphs: 2
•
Outbound citations: 24

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

K unique documents citing • w citations total to g paragraphs

Outbound citations

XA unique documents cited • 18 citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846