Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF KHMEL v. RUSSIA
CASE OF BRITANIŠKINA v. LITHUANIA
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 55/2014 of 21 January 2014 on the issue of licences for the import of garlic in the subperiod from 1 March 2014 to 31 May 2014
CASE OF VALDÍS FJÖLNISDÓTTIR AND OTHERS v. ICELANDCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE LEMMENS
Commission Regulation (EC) No 270/2009 of 2 April 2009 concerning the authorisation of 6-phytase as a feed additive for chickens for fattening (holder of the authorisation DSM Nutritional Products Ltd represented by DSM Nutritional products Sp. Z o.o.) (Text with EEA relevance)
A. v. SWITZERLAND
Commission Regulation (EC) No 195/2002 of 31 January 2002 fixing the maximum export refund on common wheat in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EC) No 943/2001
CASE OF VIOREL BURZO v. ROMANIA
CASE OF ANTWI AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
CASE OF AVRAIMOV v. UKRAINE

Document text Analytics

CASE OF SAGVOLDEN v. NORWAY

Doc ref: 21682/11 • ECHR ID: 001-169957

Document date: December 20, 2016

Inbound citations: 3
•
Cited paragraphs: 2
•
Outbound citations: 24

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

y unique documents citing • L citations total to D paragraphs

Outbound citations

FI unique documents cited • LK citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846