Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CASE OF BIRYUKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 36006/11;37211/11;53965/12;53969/12;55356/12;74792/12;76153/12;77937/12;56384/13 • ECHR ID: 001-173389

Document date: May 4, 2017

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 4

CASE OF BIRYUKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 36006/11;37211/11;53965/12;53969/12;55356/12;74792/12;76153/12;77937/12;56384/13 • ECHR ID: 001-173389

Document date: May 4, 2017

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

CASE OF BIRYUKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

( Application no. 36006/11 and 8 others - see appended list )

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG

4 May 2017

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Biryukov and Others v. Russia ,

The European Court of Human Rights ( Third Section ), sitting as a Committee composed of:

Luis López Guerra, President, Dmitry Dedov , Branko Lubarda , judges , and Karen Reid, Section Registrar ,

Having deliberated in private on 30 March 2017 ,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.

2. The applications were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”).

THE FACTS

3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.

4. The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention . Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION

6. The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of their detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:

Article 3

“No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

7. The Court notes that the applicants were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the applicants ’ detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case ‑ law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, Kud Å‚a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 90 ‑ 94, ECHR 2000 ‑ XI, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia , nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 139 ‑ 65, 10 January 2012). It reiterates in particular that extreme lack of space in a prison cell or overcrowding weighs heavily as an aspect to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the impugned detention conditions were “degrading” from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see, amongst many authorities, Karalevičius v. Lithuania , no. 53254/99, §§ 36–40, 7 April 2005).

8. In the leading case of Sergey Babushkin v. Russia, no. 5993/08, 28 November 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

9. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants ’ conditions of detention were inadequate.

10. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention.

III. REMAINING COMPLAINTS

11. In applications nos. 36006/11, 37211/11, 53965/12, 53969/12, 55356/12 and 74792/12, the applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, in accordance with the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Sergey Babushkin case (cited above, §§ 38-45).

IV . APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

12. Article 41 of the Convention provides:

“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”

13. Regard being had to the documents in its possession, to its case ‑ law and the long delay for some of the applicants in filing the application , the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

14. The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT , UNANIMOUSLY,

1. Decides to join the applications;

2. Declares the applications admissible;

3. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention ;

4. Holds that there has been a violation as regards the other complaints raised under well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);

5. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 4 May 2017 , pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Karen Reid Luis López Guerra Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention

( inadequate conditions of detention )

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant name

Date of birth

Representative name and location

Facility

Start and end date

Duration

Sq. m. per inmate

Specific grievances

Other complaints under well ‑ established case-law

Amoun t awarded for pecuniary and non ‑ pecuniary damage and costs and expenses

per applicant

(in euros) [1]

36006/11

12/05/2011

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Biryukov

18/01/1977

IK-5 Republic of Mordovia

13/03/2009

pending

More than 8 year(s) and 18 day(s)

1.3 m²

No hot water, 4-6 sinks for more than 100 inmates, toilet (holes dug out in the ground) is a separately standing facility, same temperature inside it as outside, low quality of clothes, footgear, coverings, tuberculosis-infected inmates in the dormitory, poor sanitary conditions, rodents, insects, poor quality of food and running water, no ventilation, no access to natural light.

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

22,800

37211/11

04/04/2011

(4 applicants)

Rizvan Magomedovich Akhmedov

12/10/1983

Vladimir Nikolayevich Kachayev

01/09/1974

Aram Kamoyevich Gekchan

12/09/1987

Vitaliy Viktorovich Rodin

Maryin Sergey Trofimovich

Saransk

IK-7 Republic of Mordovia

04/04/2011

pending

More than 5 year(s) and 11 month(s) and 27 day(s)

2

One hour of daily outdoor exercises, poor sanitary conditions, poor lighting, high humidity and mould, insects, no drinking water, tuberculosis and hepatitis-infected inmates in the cell

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

20,000

53965/12

26/06/2012

Sergey Mikhaylovich Kolesnikov

27/07/1981

IK-29 Kirov Region

15/09/2010

pending

More than 6 year(s) and 6 month(s) and 16 day(s)

1.5 m²

Tuberculosis-infected inmates in the dormitory.

Toilet outside, with no heating, stench, poor quality of food and running water.

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

19,500

53969/12

07/07/2012

Sergey Nikolayevich Ivanov

17/04/1977

IK-29 Kirov Region

15/08/2009 to

22/08/2013

4 year(s) and

8 day(s)

1.8 m²

Tuberculosis-infected inmates in the dormitory.

Toilet outside, with no heating, stench, insects.

Poor quality of food and running water.

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

8,500

55356/12

25/07/2012

Dmitriy Anatolyevich Shatalov

24/05/1973

IK-18 Novosibirsk

24/06/2010 to

24/04/2014

3 year(s) and

10 month(s) and

1 day(s)

1.3 m²

Fewer sleeping places than inmates, 6-7 sinks and 5-6 pans for 140-165 inmates, no hot water, no curtains to separate the lavatory.

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

10,300

74792/12

02/11/2012

Vladimir Valeryevich Partionov

16/08/1973

Gordeyeva Margarita Vladimirovna

Astrakhan

IK-1 Rostov Region

15/11/2010

pending

More than 6 year(s) and 4 month(s) and 16 day(s)

1.7 m²

Fewer sleeping places than inmates, sleeping in turns.

5 pans and 5 sinks for 137-152 inmates, no privacy when using lavatory, poor quality of food.

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

18,300

76153/12

10/10/2012

Aleksey Nikolayevich Uzilov

17/09/1976

IK-18 Kharp Yamalo-Nenetskiy Autonomous Region

10/08/2012 to

10/09/2012

1 month(s) and

1 day(s)

IK-18 Kharp Yamalo-Nenetskiy Autonomous Region

22/10/2012 to

18/11/2012

28 day(s)

3.2 m²

3.2 m²

No space to move in the cell, 4.5 sq. m. of space for three inmates for outdoor exercise, sub-zero temperature in winter time.

The lavatory pan is next to the bed, no partition.

No space to move in the cell, 4.5 sq. m. of space for three inmates for outdoor exercise, sub -zero temperature in winter time, the lavatory pan is next to the bed, no partition.

1,400

77937/12

04/12/2012

Ivan Yuryevich Tsymbarevich

19/08/1970

Vinogradov Aleksandr Vladimirovich

Kostroma

IK-4 Kostroma Region

15/07/2012 to

15/04/2013

9 month(s) and

1 day(s)

1.9 m²

Cracks in the walls.

High humidity, mould on the walls, rodents, insects, poor lighting, no artificial ventilation, poor quality of water, sanitary conditions, tuberculosis-infected inmates in the dormitory,

insufficient space for outdoor exercise.

4,300

56384/13

15/08/2013

Konstantin Eduardovich Garifullin

19/06/1974

IK-1 Nizhniy Novgorod Region

27/04/2013 to

12/07/2015

2 year(s) and

2 month(s) and

16 day(s)

1.4 m²

Poor sanitary conditions.

4 pans and 5 sinks for 130 inmates, poor lighting, no ventilation, tuberculosis and hepatitis-infected inmates in the dormitory.

8,800

[1] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255