Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF OSVATH AGAINST HUNGARY
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 885/2011 of 5 September 2011 concerning the authorisation of Bacillus subtilis (ATCC PTA-6737) as a feed additive for chickens reared for laying, ducks for fattening, quails, pheasants, partridges, guinea fowl, pigeons, geese for fattening and ostriches (holder of authorisation Kemin Europa N.V.) Text with EEA relevance
Council Regulation (EC) No 61/1999 of 18 December 1998 allocating, for 1999, catch quotas between Member States for vessels fishing in Lithuanian waters
Commission Regulation (EC) No 328/2008 of 10 April 2008 fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007
CASE OF PAIS PIRES DE LIMA AGAINST PORTUGAL
CASE OF PAPACHELAS v. GREECEPARTLY CONCURRING AND PARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GAUKUR JÖRUNDSSON
CASE OF KUKSA v. RUSSIA
CASE OF OSHURKO v. UKRAINE
CASE OF ŞAHİN KUŞ AGAINST TURKEY
CASE OF SALIKHOVA AND MAGOMEDOVA v. RUSSIA

Document text Analytics

CASE OF DIMCHO DIMOV v. BULGARIA (No. 2)

Doc ref: 77248/12 • ECHR ID: 001-174644

Document date: June 29, 2017

Inbound citations: 3
•
Cited paragraphs: 1
•
Outbound citations: 25

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

I unique documents citing • e citations total to I paragraphs

Outbound citations

lT unique documents cited • Fb citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846