Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF RATZENBÖCK AND SEYDL v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF SCHMIDT AGAINST LATVIA
Council Regulation (EC) No 818/2008 of 13 August 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 2074/2004 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain ring binder mechanisms originating in the People’s Republic of China and terminating the investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by that Regulation by imports of certain ring binder mechanisms consigned from Thailand, whether declared as originating in Thailand or not
CASE OF STORY AND OTHERS v. MALTAPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CASADEVALL
CASE OF FERRANTELLI AND SANTANGELO AGAINST ITALY
CASE OF DIGRYTĖ KLIBAVIČIENĖ v. LITHUANIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KJØLBRO
CASE OF HAPESHIS AND HAPESHI-MICHAELIDOU v. TURKEY
CASE OF HÜSEYİN ATEŞ AND MEHMET ATEŞ v. TURKEY
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1799/76 of 22 July 1976 laying down detailed rules for the application of special measures in respect of linseed
CASE OF ROMANKEVIČ v. LITHUANIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE KJØLBRO

Document text Analytics

CASE OF ANNENKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 31475/10 • ECHR ID: 001-175668

Document date: July 25, 2017

Inbound citations: 33
•
Cited paragraphs: 18
•
Outbound citations: 64

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

f6 unique documents citing • Q8 citations total to c6 paragraphs

Outbound citations

mX unique documents cited • CZ citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707