Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF CANGI AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYEPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE KRENC
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIADISSE NTING OPINION OF JUDGE PINTO DE ALBUQUERQUE
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1016/2007 of 30 August 2007 fixing the rates of refunds applicable to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty
CASE OF BUKHARATYAN v. ARMENIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE GYULUMYAN
Commission Regulation (EC) No 432/2007 of 20 April 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
CASE OF JANOSEVIC v. SWEDENPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE CASADEVALL
Commission Regulation (EC) No 84/2008 of 30 January 2008 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
CASE OF VUJICA v. CROATIACONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE MØSE
CASE OF TAUTKUS v. LITHUANIADISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE PINTO DE ALBUQUERQUE
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1119/97 of 19 June 1997 amending Regulations (EC) No 411/97 and (EC) No 412/97 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 as regards fixing a transitional time limit for 1997

Document text Analytics

CASE OF HENTSCHEL AND STARK v. GERMANY

Doc ref: 47274/15 • ECHR ID: 001-178381

Document date: November 9, 2017

Inbound citations: 8
•
Cited paragraphs: 6
•
Outbound citations: 21

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

T unique documents citing • GD citations total to 0 paragraphs

Outbound citations

0k unique documents cited • wK citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846