FOURTH SECTION

CASE OF CAZAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

( Application no. 53702/15 and 11 other application s -

see appended list )

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG

1 2 Ju ly 2018

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Cazan and Others v. Romania ,

The European Court of Human Rights ( Fourth Section ), sitting as a Committee composed of:

Vincent A. De Gaetano, President, Georges Ravarani, Marko Bošnjak , judges , and Liv Tigerstedt Acting Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having deliberated in private on 21 June 2018 ,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1. The case originated in applications against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.

2. The applications were communicated to the Romanian Government (“the Government”).

THE FACTS

3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.

4. The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention .

THE LAW

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION

6. The applicants complained of the inadequate conditions of their detention. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows:

Article 3

“No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

7. In application no. 12916/16, the Government raised a preliminary objection of failure to comply with the six-month time-limit, alleging that the applicant ’ s complaint concerning his initial period of detention in Jilava , Giurgiu and Găești Prisons had been lodged out of time.

8. The Court observes that the applicant ’ s complaint concerning the initial period of his detention in the above prison facilities, which ceased on 12 August 2015 by his transfer to another prison facility in respect of which he did not raise any complaint, was lodged with the Court on 18 May 2016, that is, more than six months after the transfer.

9. Therefore, the Court accepts the Government ’ s objection and finds that this part of the application no. 12916/16 was lodged outside of the six ‑ month time-limit and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention.

10. The Court notes that the applicants were kept in detention in poor conditions. The details of the applicants ’ detention are indicated in the appended table. The Court refers to the principles established in its case - law regarding inadequate conditions of detention (see, for instance, MurÅ¡ić v. Croatia [GC], no. 7334/13, §§ 96 ‑ 101, ECHR 2016). It reiterates in particular that a serious lack of space in a prison cell weighs heavily as a factor to be taken into account for the purpose of establishing whether the detention conditions described are “degrading” from the point of view of Article 3 and may disclose a violation, both alone or taken together with other shortcomings (see MurÅ¡ić , cited above, §§ 122 - 141, and Ananyev and Others v. Russia , nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§ 149 - 159, 10 January 2012).

11. In the leading case of RezmiveÈ™ and Others v. Romania, nos. 61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present cases.

12. Having examined all the material submitted to it, as well as the Government ’ s objection concerning the application of the six-month rule to the continuous situation of the applicants ’ conditions of detention in applications nos. 1478/16, 19325/16, 20182/16, 21633/16, 23497/16, 31945/16, and 36659/16, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant cases the applicants ’ conditions of detention were inadequate.

13. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention.

III . APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

14. Article 41 of the Convention provides:

“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”

15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, RezmiveÈ™ and Others v. Romania, nos. 61467/12 and 3 others, 25 April 2017), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

16. The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT , UNANIMOUSLY,

1. Decides to join the applications;

2. Declares the complaints concerning the inadequate conditions of detention as set out in the appended table, admissible and the remainder of the application no. 12916/16, concerning the applicant ’ s detention period which ended on 12 August 2015, inadmissible;

3. Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention ;

4. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 1 2 Ju ly 2018 , pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Liv Tigerstedt Vincent A. De Gaetano Acting D eputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention

( inadequate conditions of detention )

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant name

Date of birth

Facility

Start and end date

Duration

Sq. m. per inmate

Specific grievances

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros) [1]

53702/15

07/12/2015

Călin Cazan

12/03/1973

Bucharest Police Section no. 15

12/06/2013 to

02/07/2013

21 days

Rahova Prison

02/07/2013 to

01/08/2013

1 month

Aiud Prison

01/08/2013 to

19/05/2016

2 years and 9 months and 19 days

4.13 m²

1.95-3.26 m²

2.6-3.01 m²

Lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack or insufficient quantity of food, lack of privacy for toilet

Overcrowding (save for the period from 23/07/2013 to 01/08/2013), lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack of privacy for toilet

Overcrowding (save for the period from 16/06/2015 to 14/08/2015), lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient natural light

3,000

1478/16

02/03/2016

Teodor Tănase

01/12/1970

Bucharest Police Section no. 16 and Jilava , Poarta Albă , Gherla , Bistrița , Baia Mare, Timișoara , Drobeta Turnu Severin , Găești , and Ploiești Prisons,

Jilava and Poarta Albă Prison Hospitals

21/09/1998 to

10/01/2017

18 years and

3 months and

21 days

1.26-3.91 m²

Overcrowding (save for the periods from 05/05/2004 to 08/07/2004 in Poarta Albă Prison Hospital , from 28/12/2006 to 07/04/2009 in Gherla Prison and from 18/04/2013 to 17/10/2013 in Găești Prison ), no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to shower, lack of fresh air, mouldy or dirty cell, lack of or insufficient natural light, poor quality of food, poor quality of potable water, inadequate temperature, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air

5,000

1874/16

09/05/2016

Ionuț Ciucă

29/01/1981

Represented by

Irina Maria Peter,

Bucharest

Bucharest Central Arrest

27/07/2002 to

10/08/2002

15 days

Jilava , Giurgiu, Mărgineni , Gala ț i , Colibași , Brăila and Tulcea Prisons

10/09/2002

pending

More than 15 years and 8 months and

23 days

1.6 m²

1.3-

3.39 m²

Overcrowding, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, poor quality of food

Overcrowding (save for the periods from 19/02/2012 to 23/08/2012 in Giurgiu Prison), infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, inadequate temperature, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to potable water

5,000

12916/16

18/05/2016

Fănel Docuţă

21/06/1974

Alexandria Police and Giurgiu, Jilava and Găești Prisons

29/12/2015 to

19/04/2017

1 year and 3 months and 22 days

1.07-3.18 m²

Overcrowding (save for the period from 27/06/2016 to 16/02/2017 in Găești Prison), lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, no or restricted access to shower, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack or inadequate furniture, no or restricted access to toilet, lack of fresh air

3,000

19325/16

04/05/2016

Dumitru Ifrim

25/10/1969

Bucarest Police Section no. 12, Rahova , Târgu Jiu, Jilava Prisons

07/04/2015 to

23/02/2017

1 year and

10 months and

17 days

1.67-4.90 m²

Overcrowding (save for the periods from 28/07/2015 to 16/02/2016 in Rahova Prison), poor quality of food, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of fresh air

3,000

19872/16

06/06/2016

Vasile Alecu

05/09/1969

Jilava Prison Hospital

23/09/2012 to

26/07/2016

3 years and

10 months and

4 days

2.65 -9.20 m²

Overcrowding (save for the periods from 01/10/2012 to 02/09/2013, from 25/11/2013 to 06/12/2013 and from 04/08/2015 to 26/07/2016 in Jilava Prison Hospital), infestation of cell with insects/rodents, bunk beds, inadequate temperature, lack of fresh air, constant electric light, lack or inadequate furniture, lack or insufficient quantity of food

3,000

20182/16

18/05/2016

Nicolae Eftimie

29/08/1982

Bucharest Police Sections nos. 12 and 13

Jilava , Giurgiu, Rahova , Găești , Prisons

Jilava and Coliba È™ i Prison Hospitals

04/07/2007 to

08/03/2017

9 years and 8 months and 5 days

1.12-16.07 m²

Overcrowding (save for the periods from 01/03/2010 to 10/03/2010, from 20/05/2011 to 26/05/2011, from 10/10/2011 to 17/11/2011, from 05/06/2012 to 20/06/2012 and from 19/05/2016 to 26/05/2016 in Jilava Prison Hospital and from 14/10/2015 to 17/03/2016 in Găești Prison ), no or restricted access to toilet, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, no or restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, inadequate temperature, mouldy or dirty cell, lack or inadequate furniture, lack of or insufficient natural light, lack of or insufficient electric light, poor quality of food, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, no or restricted access to potable water,

5,000

21633/16

22/06/2016

Viorel Istodor

04/01/1978

Represented by

Irina Maria Peter,

Bucharest

Drobeta Turnu Severin , Craiova, Aiud and Jilava Prisons

26/09/2001 to

23/08/2016

14 years and

10 months and

29 days

1 -3.2 m²

Overcrowding (save for the periods from 29/03/2012 to 06/09/2012 in Aiud Prison) , inadequate temperature, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, lack or inadequate furniture, poor quality of food

5,000

23222/16

16/05/2016

Alexandru-Traian

Zaharia

09/11/1987

Codlea Prison

28/10/2015 to 07/12/2016

1 year and

2 months and

1 day

Bunk beds, lack of fresh air, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack or inadequate furniture, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to shower

3,000

23497/16

22/04/2016

Dumitrel Motică

14/01/1981

Slobozia , Poarta Albă , Tulcea , Giurgiu and Arad Prisons

02/08/2007 to

25/07/2017

9 years and

11 months and

24 days

1.44-

9.00 m²

Overcrowding (save for the periods from 17/10/2013 to 24/11/2014 in Tulcea Prison and from 27/11/2014 to 06/07/2015 in Giurgiu Prison and from 25/09/2015 to 19/01/2017 in Arad Prison), mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, poor quality of food, no or restricted access to toilet, no or restricted access to shower, bunk beds, inadequate temperature, lack of privacy for toilet

5,000

31945/16

07/07/2016

Marian Parolea

20/02/1970

Represented by

Irina Maria Peter,

Bucharest

Teleorman Police, Giurgiu and Jilava Prisons

17/01/2014 to

22/08/2017

3 years and 7 months and 6 days

1.72-5.10 m²

Overcrowding (save of the period from 03/06/2015 to 23/12/2015 in Giurgiu Prison), inadequate temperature, lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, poor quality of food, lack or inadequate furniture, poor quality of potable water

3,000

36659/16

14/07/2016

Alexandr Strutinschi

05/05/1981

Represented by

Irina Maria Peter,

Bucharest

Bucharest Police Sections nos. 4, 12 and 22, Bucharest Central Arrest, Rahova Prison

15/11/2015 to

12/12/2016

1 year and 28 days

1.96-6.52 m²

Overcrowding (save for the periods from 15/11/2015 to 07/12/2015 in Bucharest Police Section no. 4 and from 16/06/2016 to 12/12/2016 in Rahova Prison), lack of or inadequate hygienic facilities, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, lack of or insufficient physical exercise in fresh air, inadequate temperature, lack of privacy for toilet, lack of fresh air, poor quality of food, lack or inadequate furniture

3,000

[1] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.