Browsing history:

↳
CASE OF DIENNET v. FRANCEPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE MORENILLA
Commission Regulation (EC) No 506/2007 of 8 May 2007 imposing testing and information requirements on the importers or manufacturers of certain priority substances in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 on the evaluation and control of the risks of existing substances (Text with EEA relevance )
CASE OF PİŞKİN v. TURKEYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE BO Å NJAK
Commission Regulation (EU) No 133/2011 of 14 February 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
POST v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF PİŞKİN v. TURKEYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE koskelo
Commission Regulation (EC) No 411/2008 of 8 May 2008 fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1060/2007
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 64/80 of 14 January 1980 fixing the import levies on white sugar and raw sugar
CASE OF DÖNER AND OTHERS v. TURKEYCONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE LEMMENS
Commission Regulation (EC) No 424/2007 of 19 April 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

Document text Analytics

CASE OF ABDILLA v. MALTA

Doc ref: 36199/15 • ECHR ID: 001-184673

Document date: July 17, 2018

Inbound citations: 8
•
Cited paragraphs: 6
•
Outbound citations: 37

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

G unique documents citing • 3h citations total to v paragraphs

Outbound citations

1W unique documents cited • ac citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846