LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
CASE OF OKILJ AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
Doc ref: 31901/16;41532/16;42152/16;43869/16;8125/17;12385/17 • ECHR ID: 001-195862
Document date: September 19, 2019
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 3
CASE OF OKILJ AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
Doc ref: 31901/16;41532/16;42152/16;43869/16;8125/17;12385/17 • ECHR ID: 001-195862
Document date: September 19, 2019
Cited paragraphs only
THIRD SECTION
CASE OF OKILJ AND OTH ER S v. SERBIA
( Application s no s . 31901/16 and 5 others - see appended list )
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
19 September 2019
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Okilj and Others v. Serbia ,
The European Court of Human Rights ( Third Section ), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Dmitry Dedov, President, Alena Poláčková , Gilberto Felici , judges, and Liv Tigerstedt , Acting Deputy Section Registrar ,
Having deliberated in private on 29 August 2019 ,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
1. The case originated in applications against Serbia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table .
2. Notice of the applications was given to the Serbian Government (“the Government”).
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicant s and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicant s complained of the excessive length of civil proceedings .
THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
6. The applicant s complained that the length of the civil proceedings in question had been incompatible with the “reasonable time” requirement. They relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows:
Article 6 § 1
“In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a ... hearing within a reasonable time by [a] ... tribunal ...”
7. The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant s and the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant s in the dispute (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
8. In the leading case of Nemet v. Serbia, no. 22543/05, 8 December 2009, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
9. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the “reasonable time” requirement.
10. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
11. Article 41 of the Convention provides:
“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”
12. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case ‑ law (see, in particular, Nemet v. Serbia, no. 22543/05, §§ 19-22, 8 December 2009), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table and it dismisses the remainder of the applicants ’ claims for just satisfaction.
13. The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT , UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicant s , within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;
Done in English, and notified in writing on 19 September 2019 , pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Liv Tigerstedt Dmitry Dedov
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
( excessive length of civil proceedings )
No.
Application no.
Date of introduction
Applicant ’ s name
Date of birth
Representative ’ s name and location
Start of proceedings or date of entry into force the Convention in respect of Serbia (3 March 2004)
End of proceedings
Total length Levels of jurisdiction
Relevant domestic decision
Domestic award
Amount awarded for non-pecuniary damage per applicant
(in euros) [1] [2]
Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application
(in euros) [3]
31901/16
26/04/2016
Dragoslav Okilj
08/11/1949
Radovanović Srđan
Belgrade
05/05/2005
20/02/2013
7 years and 9 months and 16 days
2 levels of jurisdiction
Constitutional Court
Už-2775/2013
24/09/2015
No award
1,000
500
41532/16
11/07/2016
Rade Antonijević
04/10/1974
Glavonjić Radenko
Čačak
19/11/2004
15/07/2013
8 years and 7 months and 27 days
2 levels of jurisdiction
Constitutional Court
Už-6912/2013
25/02/2016
No violation
1,700
500
42152/16
11/07/2016
Milenko Drobnjaković
13/06/1949
Glavonjić Radenko
Čačak
28/10/2004
15/07/2013
8 years and 8 months and 18 days
2 levels of jurisdiction
Constitutional Court
Už-6912/2013
25/02/2016
No violation
1,700
500
43869/16
11/07/2016
Mlađo Lazović
09/09/1967
Glavonjić Radenko
Čačak
19/11/2004
15/07/2013
8 years and 7 months and 27 days
2 levels of jurisdiction
Constitutional Court
Už-6912/2013
25/02/2016
No violation
1,700
500
8125/17
16/01/2017
Vladan Radovanović
15/07/1971
Dugošija Ružica
Žabari
14/03/2007
09/04/2014
7 years and 27 days
2 levels of jurisdiction
Constitutional Court
Už-5800/2014
15/09/2016
No violation
1,300
500
12385/17
04/02/2017
Radojka Bajić
17/07/1949
Božić Dejan
Å abac
05/07/2007
pending
More than 11 years and 11 months and 2 days
1 level of jurisdiction
Constitutional Court
Už-6882/2014
30/06/2016
400 euros
1,900
500[1] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
[2] . Less any amounts which may have already been paid in that regard at the domestic level .
[3] . Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
