Browsing history:

↳
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1277/2007 of 29 October 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 1438/2003 laying down implementing rules on the Community Fleet Policy as defined in Chapter III of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002
CASE OF RUBAN v. UKRAINEDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE HAJIYEV
ARTICO CASE
CASE OF RADOVICI AND STANESCU v. ROMANIA [Extracts]
Ştefănescu v. Romania (dec.)
AZEMI v. SERBIA
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 41/2013 of 17 January 2013 amending Regulation (EEC) No 441/91 concerning the classification of certain goods in the codes 17041019 , 17041099 and 95021010 of the Combined Nomenclature and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 1287/83
CASE OF X v. TURKEYPARTLY DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE JOÄŒIENÄ–
Commission Regulation (EU) No 186/2014 of 26 February 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 823/2012 as regards the expiry dates of the approval of the active substances ethoxysulfuron, oxadiargyl and warfarin Text with EEA relevance
CASE OF ENVER ŞAHİN v. TURKEYDISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE LEMMENS

Document text Analytics

CASE OF MAZAHIR JAFAROV v. AZERBAIJAN

Doc ref: 39331/09 • ECHR ID: 001-202116

Document date: April 2, 2020

Inbound citations: 4
•
Cited paragraphs: 4
•
Outbound citations: 20

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

Y unique documents citing • T citations total to E paragraphs

Outbound citations

pD unique documents cited • WT citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846