Browsing history:

↳
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 October 2003. AstraZeneca A/S v Lægemiddelstyrelsen.
LATVIJAS JAUNO ZEMNIEKU APVIENĪBA v. LATVIA
Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 March 2022. Proceedings brought by A.
CASE OF S.C. CONCORDIA INTERNATIONAL S.R.L. CONSTANTA v. ROMANIA
CASE OF BATKIVSKA TURBOTA FOUNDATION AGAINST UKRAINE
Council Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 1990/88 of 30 June 1988 amending Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 2891/77 implementing the Decision of 21 April 1970 on the replacement of financial contributions from Member States by the Communities' own resources
Commission Regulation (EEC) No 21/79 of 4 January 1979 fixing the corrective amount applicable to the refund on cereals
CASE OF ȘTEFĂNESCU AND OTHERS AGAINST ROMANIA AND 1 OTHER CASE
CASE OF PYSATYUK AGAINST UKRAINE AND 7 OTHER CASES
CASE OF HIRST (No. 2) AND 3 OTHER CASES AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM

Document text Analytics

CASE OF MANOLE AND POSTICA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA

Doc ref: 4711/07 • ECHR ID: 001-210734

Document date: June 29, 2021

Inbound citations: 1
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 35

At a glance

Citations by paragraph

Historical distribution of citations

Detailed analytics

Inbound citations

F unique documents citing • b citations total to S paragraphs

Outbound citations

8T unique documents cited • SG citations total

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846