SECOND SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 39095/04 by Klára TAKÁCS against Hungary

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 1 5 May 2007 as a Chamber composed of:

Mrs F. Tulkens , President , Mr A.B. Baka , Mr I. Cabral Barreto , Mr R. Türmen , Mrs A. Mularoni , Ms D. Jočienė , Mr D. Popović, judges , and Mrs S. Dollé , Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 8 September 2004,

Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits of the case together ,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS

The app licant, Ms Klára Takács, is a Hungarian national who was born in 1951 and lives in Tárnok. She was represented before the Court by Mr L. Hegedűs, a lawyer practising in Budapest . The Hungarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr L. Höltzl , Agent, Ministry of Justice and Law Enforcement .

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

On 27 May 1992 criminal proceedings were instituted against the applicant. On 19 July 1994 the Budapest Public Prosecutor ’ s Office preferred a bill of indictment, charging the applicant with fraud and the forgery of documents.

After numerous hearings, on 9 January 2002 the Pest Central District Court acquitted the applicant. On 12 November 2002 the Budapest Regional Court quashed this decision and remitted the case to the first-instance court.

In the resumed proceedings, several hearings were held. On 7 September 2005 the District Court again acquitted the applicant. This judgment was confirmed by the Regional Court on 29 September 2006.

COMPLAINT

The applicant originally complain ed under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of the proceedings .

THE LAW

The Court received the following declaration from the Government:

“ I declare that the Government of Hungary offer to pay ex gratia 12,000 euros to Ms Klára Takács with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights.

This sum, which is to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be converted into the national currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. ”

The Court also received the following declaration signed by the applicant:

“I note that the Government of Hungary are prepared to pay me ex gratia the sum of 12,000 euros with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights.

This sum, which is to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be converted into the national currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. From the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

I accept the proposal and waive any further claims against Hungary in respect of the facts giving rise to this application. I declare that this constitutes a final resolution of the case.”

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no public policy reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention).

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

S. Dollé F. Tulkens Registrar President