THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 11410/05 by Emil STOIAN against Romania

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 25 January 2011 as a Committee composed of:

Elisabet Fura , President, Boštjan M. Zupančič , Ineta Ziemele , judges, and Marialena Tsirli , Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 16 March 2005,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS

The applicant, Mr Emil Stoian , is a Romanian national who was born on an unspecified date and lives in Clu j -Napoca . The Romanian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr R ă zvan ‑ HoraÅ£iu Radu , from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs .

In 1978, the Cluj Military County Court sentenced the applicant, w ho was a J ehovah ’ s Witness, to three years imprisonment for refusing, for religious reasons, to perform mandatory military service. In 2002 , claiming that he had been politically persecuted by the communist regime, the applicant brought proceedings against the Cluj Labour and Social Agency under Law-Decree No. 118 of 1990 , seeking to be awarded the benefits provided for politically persecuted people . In its final decision of 16 September 20 04, the Cluj Court o f Appeal dismissed the applicant ’ s action on the ground that the refusal to be recruited to the army was not a political crime in nature and that therefore the provisions of Law ‑ Decree No. 118 of 1990 did not apply in his case.

COMPLAINTS

The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention , that he did not have a fair hearing before the national courts in respect of the determination of his status as a politically persecuted person, following his imprisonment during the time of the communist regime because of his refusal to perform mandatory military service.

He also alleged in substance a violation of Article 14 of the Convention taken together with Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, claiming that the same courts had adopted opposite decisions in identical cases concerning Jehovah ’ s Witnesses.

THE LAW

On 31 May 2010 the Court decided to give notice to the Government of the applicant ’ s complaints detailed above.

By letter dated 28 September 2010 the Government ’ s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations in reply together with his claims for just satisfaction by 9 November 2010 .

By letter dated 3 December 2010 the applicant informed the Court that he wanted t o withdraw the application as, by decision of 28 February 2008, he had obtained satisfaction at the national level. He also mentioned that, since 1 st December 2008, he had been receiving payment of the pecuniary rights claimed in his application before the Court.

The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Marialena Tsirli Elisabet Fura Deputy Registrar President