Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CROITORU v. ROMANIA

Doc ref: 19457/04 • ECHR ID: 001-106604

Document date: September 20, 2011

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

CROITORU v. ROMANIA

Doc ref: 19457/04 • ECHR ID: 001-106604

Document date: September 20, 2011

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 19457/04 by Petre CROITORU against Romania

The European Court of Human Rights ( Third Section ), sitting on 20 September 2011 as a Committee composed of:

Alvina Gyulumyan , President, Luis López Guerra , Nona Tsotsoria , judges, and Marialena Tsirli , Deputy Section Registra r ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 5 May 2004,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS

The applicant, Mr Petre Croitoru , is a Romanian national who lives in Drobeta-Turnu Severin . The Romanian Government (“the Government ” ) were represented by their Co- Agent, Ms I. Cambrea, from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

The applicant ’ s complaints under Articles 6 § 1 of the Convention and 1 of Protocol No. 1 were communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit his own observations and his just satisfaction claims . No reply was received to the Registry ’ s letter.

By letter dated 4 October 2010 , sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 8 October 2009 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicant ’ s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. The applicant received the letter on 11 October 2010. However, no response has been received.

THE LAW

The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furtherm ore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Marialena Tsirli Alvina Gyulumyan Deputy Registrar President

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846