Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

SALIPUROVIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Doc ref: 39364/08 • ECHR ID: 001-109196

Document date: February 7, 2012

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

SALIPUROVIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

Doc ref: 39364/08 • ECHR ID: 001-109196

Document date: February 7, 2012

Cited paragraphs only

FOURTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 39364/08 Bož idar ŠALIPUROVIĆ and Others against Bosnia and Herzegovina

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 7 February 2012 as a Committee composed of:

George Nicolaou , President, Ledi Bianku , Vincent A. D e Gaetano , judges, and Fatoş Aracı , Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 24 July 2008,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

PROCEDURE

1 . The application has initially been submitted by four citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina , Mr Bo ž idar Šalipurović , Ms Darinka Šalipurović , Mr Nedeljko Šalipurović and Ms Slavica Šalipurović , who were born in 1950 , 1948, 1969 and 1975, respectively. On 29 March 2011 Mr Nedeljko Šalipurović informed the Court that Mr Božidar Šalipurović had died on 29 October 2010. The Bosnian-Herzegovinian Government ( “the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms M. Mijić .

2 . The applicant s complained under Article 6 of, and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to, the Convention of the non-enforcement of the final judgment adopted in their favour against the Republika Srpska by the Vlasenica First Instance Court on 7 February 2001.

3 . On 14 March, 14 September and 7 December 2011 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the par ties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Bosnia and Herzegovina in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaki ng by the Government to pay them in solidum 1,000 euros to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into convertible marks at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and w ould be free of any taxes that may be applicable . The sum would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

4 . The parties, furthermore, agreed that the Government would secure full enforcement of the domestic judgment under consideration in the present case in cash within nine months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the Convention.

The se payment s constitute d the final resolution of the case.

THE LAW

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention).

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Fatoş Aracı George Nicolaou Deputy Registrar President

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2025

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 400211 • Paragraphs parsed: 44892118 • Citations processed 3448707