Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

MRAMOR v. SLOVENIA

Doc ref: 16729/07 • ECHR ID: 001-114151

Document date: October 2, 2012

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

MRAMOR v. SLOVENIA

Doc ref: 16729/07 • ECHR ID: 001-114151

Document date: October 2, 2012

Cited paragraphs only

FIFTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 16729/07 Marija MRAMOR against Slovenia

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 2 October 2012 as a Committee composed of:

Ann Power-Forde, President, Boštjan M. Zupančič , Angelika Nußberger , judges, and Stephen Phillips , Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 4 April 2007,

Having regard to the friendly settlement reached between the parties,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

PROCEDURE

The applicant, Ms Marija Mramor , is a Slovenian national, who was born in 1939 and lives in Loče . She was represented before the Court by Mr V. Cugmas , a lawyer practising in Slovenske Konjice .

The Slovenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

The applicant was a party to proceedings which were terminated within the first three months after the Act on the Protection of the Right to a Trial without Undue Delay became operational. The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the excessive length of proceedings and under Article 13 of the Convention about the lack of an effective domestic remedy in that regard.

The Court notes that a settlement was reached between the parties at the domestic level by which the Government acknowledged a violation of the right to a trial within a reasonable time and undertook to pay the applicant compensation with respect to non-pecuniary damages incurred as a result of the unreasonable length of proceeding.

THE LAW

The Court is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention).

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Stephen Phillips Ann Power-Forde Deputy Registrar President

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255