Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

DIDANOVIĆ AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

Doc ref: 21305/13;21490/13;67600/13;67844/13;69570/13;69571/13;71766/13 • ECHR ID: 001-146841

Document date: September 2, 2014

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

DIDANOVIĆ AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

Doc ref: 21305/13;21490/13;67600/13;67844/13;69570/13;69571/13;71766/13 • ECHR ID: 001-146841

Document date: September 2, 2014

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 21305/13 Nada DIDANOVIĆ against Serbia and 6 other applications (see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights ( Third Section), sitting on 2 September 2014 as a Committee composed of:

Ján Šikuta , President, Dragoljub Popović , Iulia Antoanella Motoc , judges,

and Marialena Tsirli , Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above applications lodged between 8 March and 2 October 2013,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicants ’ personal details are set out in the appended table. The Serbian Government ("the Government") were represented by their Agent, Ms V. Rodić .

Relying on Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, the applicants complained about the respondent State ’ s failure to enforce final court decisions rendered in their favour against socially/State-owned companies. The applicants also obtained decisions of the Constitutional Court of Serbia finding a breach of their constitutional rights, awarding them certain sums as compensation for non-pecuniary damage and ordering the competent courts to bring the impugned enforcement proceedings to a conclusion as soon as possible. However, the final court judgments under consideration in these cases remain unenforced to the present day. The essential information as to the domestic proceedings in respect of each application is indicated in the appended table.

Between 8 January and 2 June 2014 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Serbia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay each of them 2,000 EUR (two thousand euros) less any amounts which may have already been paid on the basis of the relevant Constitutional Courts ’ decision to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into local currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be free of any taxes that may be applicable. These sums would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay these sums within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The parties, furthermore, agreed that within the said three-month period the Government would pay, from their own funds, the sums awarded in the domestic decisions under consideration in the present cases (see table appended), less any amounts which may have already been paid on the basis of the said decisions, plus the costs of the domestic enforcement proceedings. These payments will constitute the final resolution of the cases pending before the European Court of Human Rights.

THE LAW

The Court considers that, in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given their similar factual and legal background.

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no public policy reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention).

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention .

Marialena Tsirli Ján Å ikuta              Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application

no. and date of introduction

Applicant name

date of birth

nationality

Represented by

Final domestic decision details

Enforcement order details

Constitutional Court decision details / non-pecuniary damage awarded

21305/13

08/03/2013

Nada DIDANOVIĆ

06/10/1960

Serbian

Snežana JOKIĆ

Čačak

28/02/2008

Čačak

04/11/2008

10/10/2012

400 EUR

21490/13

11/03/2013

Branko PETROVIĆ

07/04/1963

Serbian

Snežana JOKIĆ

Čačak

07/11/2008

Čačak

24/02/2009

27/09/2012

300 EUR

67600/13

02/10/2013

Milorad LUKIĆ

18/03/1959

Serbian

Dragana JANKOVIĆ

Čačak

04/02/2008

Čačak

02/09/2008

24/09/2008

11/04/2013

400 EUR

67844/13

01/10/2013

Velimir ŽIVKOVIĆ

09/12/1957

Serbian

Dragana JANKOVIĆ

Čačak

08/07/2008

Čačak

15/05/2009

04/04/2013

1,100 EUR

69570/13

01/10/2013

Milan KALJEVIĆ

06/07/1961

Serbian

Dragana JANKOVIĆ

Čačak

08/07/2008

Čačak

15/05/2009

04/04/2013

1,100 EUR

69571/13

01/10/2013

Slađan NEŠOVIĆ

07/09/1960

Serbian

Dragana JANKOVIĆ

Čačak

08/07/2008

Čačak

15/05/2009

04/04/2013

1,100 EUR

71766/13

11/03/2013

Ostoja MARKOVIĆ

15/06/1942

Serbian

Snežana JOKIĆ

Čačak

07/11/2008

Čačak

24/02/2009

27/12/2012

300 EUR

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255