SECOND SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 17323/07 Slavka LAKIĆEVIĆ against Montenegro and 7 other applications (see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights ( Second Section ), sitting on 30 September 2014 as a Committee composed of:

Paul Lemmens , President, Nebojša Vučinić , Egidijus Kūris , judges,

and Abel Campos , Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above applications lodged between 8 December 2006 and 7 April 2007 ,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The seven applicants in the present cases lodged eight applications (the s ixth applicant lodged two applications ) between 6 December 2006 and 7 April 2007 (for additional personal details see the attached Annex). They are all represented before the Court by Mr R. Šuković and Mr B. Minić (who is also the third applicant), lawyers practising in Bijelo Polje and Kolašin, respectively, except for the t hird applicant himself, who is represented by Mr R. Šuković alone.

The Montenegrin Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Z. Pa ž in.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows:

On an unspecified date in 2003 the third applicant filed a compensation claim against the State, maintaining that his right to a trial within a reasonable time had been violated, as one set of enforcement proceedings to which he was a party was still ongoing. On 23 December 2004 the Court of First Instance ( Osnovni sud ) in Bijelo Polje ruled partly in his favour, relying on section 11 of the Civil Procedure Act and section 7 of the Courts Act , as well as on Article 6 of the Convention. It would appear that on an unspecified date thereafter the State filed an appeal. There is no information in the case files as to the outcome of the appeal.

Between 1 January 2005 and 28 December 2005 all the applicants filed compensation claims against the State, maintaining that their right to a trial within a reasonable time had been violated, as a number of civil proceedings, previously instituted by or against them, were still ongoing at the time.

On 16 June 2005 and 2 June 2006, respectively, the Court of First Instance in Bijelo Polje ruled against the third applicant upon two other such compensation claims, on the grounds that these proceedings in respect of which he had complained of the length, were concluded within a reasonable time and that the third applicant had contributed to the length thereof, respectively.

On 26 June 2006 the Supreme Court ( Vrhovni sud ) issued a legal opinion ( pravni stav ) specifying that the national legal system of Montenegro did not have a legal remedy for violations of the right to a trial within a reasonable time, that the courts in Montenegro had no jurisdiction to rule on the matter and that all those who considered that their right to a trial within a reasonable time had been violated could lodge an application with the European Court of Human Rights .

Between 11 July 2006 and 28 September 2006 the Court of First Instance in Bijelo Polje decided it had no jurisdiction to rule on the applicants ’ compensation claims and rejected them. These decisions were upheld by the High Court ( Viši sud ) in Bijelo Polje by 3 May 2007. In so doing both courts referred to the Supreme Court ’ s legal opinion.

On 1 February 2007 and 18 October 2006, respectively, the High Court in Bijelo Polje quashed the first-instance judgments issued on 16 June 2005 and 2 June 2006 in respect of the third applicant and rejected his claims, also relying on the said legal opinion.

The applicants did not attempt to make use of an appeal on points of law ( revizija ) to the Supreme Court in view of the fact that the said opinion was issued by that very court.

COMPLAINTS

The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 and, alternatively, under Article 13 of the Convention about the lack of access to a court in that the domestic courts refused to examine their compensation claims on the merits .

THE LAW

Th e Court considers that, in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given their similar factual and legal background.

Between 30 April 2014 and 11 July 2014 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Montenegro in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay each of them ex gratia (per applicant and not per application) the amounts specified in the appended table to cover any and all non-pecuniary damage, which includes costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

These sums will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay th ese sums within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pa y simple interest on it, from th e expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The se payment s will constitute the final resolution of the cases.

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications ;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

Abel Campos Paul Lemmens              Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application

no.

Lodged on

Applicant name

Nationality

Place of residence

Represented by

Case number before the domestic courts

Friendly settlement amount

17323/07

07/04/2007

Slavka LAKI Ć EVI Ć

(the first applicant)

Serbian

Kula

Budislav MINI Ć and Radivoje Å UKOVI Ć

P. br. 1013/05

3,760 EUR

17330/07

07/04/2007

Sne ž ana OBRADOVI Ć

(the second applicant)

Serbian

Sivac

Budislav MINI Ć and Radivoje Å UKOVI Ć

P. br. 1027/05

3,760 EUR

17351/07

07/04/2007

Budislav MINI Ć

(the third applicant)

Montenegrin

Kola Å¡ in

Radivoje Å UKOVI Ć

P. br. 258/06

3,760 EUR

17365/07

07/04/2007

Milan LAKI Ć EVI Ć

(the fourth applicant)

Serbian

Sivac

Budislav MINI Ć and Radivoje Å UKOVI Ć

P. br. 1012/05

3,760 EUR

17392/07

07/04/2007

Mijomir MEDENICA

(the fifth applicant)

Montenegrin

Kola Å¡ in

Budislav MINI Ć and Radivoje Å UKOVI Ć

P. br. 922/05

3,760 EUR

30603/08

08/12/2006

Rodoljub ADAMOVI Ć

(the sixth applicant)

Serbian

Ni Å¡

Budislav MINI Ć and Radivoje Å UKOVI Ć

P. br. 12/06

4,840 EUR

30608/08

08/12/2006

Rodoljub ADAMOVI Ć

(the sixth applicant)

Serbian

Ni Å¡

Budislav MINI Ć and Radivoje Å UKOVI Ć

P. br. 115/06

30614/08

08/12/2006

Zorka GAZIBARA-ADAMOVIĆ

(the seventh applicant)

Serbian

Ni Å¡

Budislav MINI Ć and Radivoje Å UKOVI Ć

P. br. 194/06

3,760 EUR