Search
document

STAVROPOLTSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 9929/05, 12763/05, 20670/05, 28632/05, 33678/05, 511/06, 8864/06, 8933/06, 23189/06, 43122/06, 49033... • ECHR ID: 001-152266

Document date: January 13, 2015

Inbound citations: 2
•
Cited paragraphs: 0
•
Outbound citations: 0

STAVROPOLTSEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 9929/05, 12763/05, 20670/05, 28632/05, 33678/05, 511/06, 8864/06, 8933/06, 23189/06, 43122/06, 49033... • ECHR ID: 001-152266

Document date: January 13, 2015

Cited paragraphs only

FIRST SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 9929/05 Aleksandr Aleksandrovich STAVROPOLTSEV against Russia and 16 other applications (see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 13 January 2015 as a Committee composed of:

Khanlar Hajiyev , President, Julia Laffranque , Dmitry Dedov, judges,

and André Wampach , Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above applications,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicants are Russian nationals whose names and dates of birth are tabulated below.

The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G. Matyushkin , Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights.

The facts of the cases and the complaints may be summarized as follows:

The applicants were parties to civil or criminal proceedings that took place in courts of ordinary jurisdiction in various regions of Russia. The applicants complained under Article 6 of the Convention, Article 1 of Protocol 1 and/or Article 13 of the Convention, invoking the following Convention issues:

- quashing of the final judgments in the applicants ’ favour by way of a supervisory review (cases nos. 9929/05, 20670/05, 33678/05 and 511/06);

- non-enforcement of the final judgment in the applicant ’ s favour and about its subsequent quashing by way of supervisory review (case no. 12763/05);

- unreasonable length of the civil proceedings and the lack of effective domestic remedies against excessive length of court proceedings (cases nos. 28632/05, 49033/06, 49062/06, 2125/07, 3504/07 and 21166/07);

- unreasonable length of the criminal proceedings and the lack of effective domestic remedies against excessive length of court proceedings (cases nos. 8864/06, 8933/06, 43122/06 and 2019/07); and

- non-enforcement of the final judgment in the applicant ’ s favour (cases nos. 23189/06 and 50213/06).

The applicants ’ complaints concerning the above-mentioned issues were communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No replies were received to the Registry ’ s letters from the applicants.

By separate letters sent by registered post on various dates in 2009 ‑ 2013, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired and that no extension of time had been requested.

In cases nos. 50213/06 and 21166/07, the Government informed the Court about the applicants ’ death. In this connection the Court sent letters, seeking information from the applicants ’ heirs or family members whether they wish to pursue the proceedings of these cases before the Court. No replies followed.

The applicants ’ attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicants do not intend to pursue the applications. However, no responses have been received.

THE LAW

The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 5 February 2015 .

André Wampach Khanlar Hajiyev Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

Application No

Lodged on

Applicant

Date of birth

Place of residence

Represented by

9929/05

03/02/2005

Aleksandr Aleksandrovich STAVROPOLTSEV

03/02/1983

Syzran

12763/05

14/03/2005

Olga Vladimirovna SHILO

27/05/1965

Aykhal

20670/05

23/04/2005

Svetlana Arkadevna VARSHETSKAYA

07/08/1986

Volsk

28632/05

25/07/2005

Irina Ivanovna SHESTAKOVA

07/11/1960

Vladimir

33678/05

10/08/2005

Ivan Anatolyevich DAVYDYUK

11/06/1987

Syzran

511/06

16/11/2005

Sergey Vladimirovich DYULDIN

12/06/1968

Samara

Yevgeniy Vladimirovich DYULDIN

16/01/1974

Samara

Stanislav Viktorovich YUNOSHEV

8864/06

11/02/2006

Anatoliy Vasilyevich BORISOV

19/08/1954

Sovetsk

8933/06

01/02/2006

Oleg Yanovich TELIDIS

03/03/1968

Vladivostok

Alla Aleksandrovna TELIDI

23189/06

07/04/2006

Sergey Vladimirovich KOLOSOV

13/12/1979

Elista

43122/06

10/08/2006

Azat Marsovich SAFIN

23/12/1970

Ufa

49033/06

11/10/2006

Larisa Vladimirovna KOMAROVA

02/09/1967

Severobaykalsk

Yuriy Veniaminovich BOGDANOV

49062/06

25/10/2006

Nikolay Vladimirovich ROMANOV

24/09/1941

Artem

50213/06

31/10/2006

Nikolay Nasunovich TARVENOV

25/12/1966

Date of demise

11/09/2011

Akhnud

2019/07

24/11/2006

Oleg Nikolayevich KAZAKOV

24/09/1963

Ryazan

2125/07

18/11/2006

Yuriy Mikhaylovich BRAUDE-ZOLOTAREV

19/01/1929

Moscow

Yuliya Goroldovna KOVSHAROVA

3504/07

30/11/2006

Oleg Vladimirovich SANNIKOV

31/01/1978

Ust-Luga

21166/07

28/02/2007

Irina Kuzminichna CHURSINA

01/09/1923

Date of demise

06/12/2007

Taganrog

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant