Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

PAVLOVIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

Doc ref: 11657/09;70223/10;74411/10;75124/10;13502/11;25421/11;60107/12;50269/13 • ECHR ID: 001-154178

Document date: March 31, 2015

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

PAVLOVIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

Doc ref: 11657/09;70223/10;74411/10;75124/10;13502/11;25421/11;60107/12;50269/13 • ECHR ID: 001-154178

Document date: March 31, 2015

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 11657/09 Milun PAVLOVIĆ against Serbia and 7 other applications (see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights ( Third Section ), sitting on 31 March 2015 as a Committee composed of:

Ján Šikuta , President, Dragoljub Popović , Iulia Antoanella Motoc , judges,

and Marialena Tsirli , Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above applications lodged between 17 February 2009 and 22 July 2013,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

A list of the applicants and their representatives is set out in the appended table .

The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms V. Rodi ć .

Relying on Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 , the applicants complained about the non- enforcement of final court decisions rendered in their favour against socially/State-owned compan ies . T he final court decisions under consideration in this case remain unenforced to the present day.

The essential information as to the domestic proceedings in respect of each application is indicated in the append ix .

Between 4 March 2014 and 5 August 2014 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Serbia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an undertaking by the Government to pay each of them 2,000 EUR (two thousand euros) , less any amounts which may have already been paid in that regard at the domestic level, to cover any non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into local currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be free of any taxes that may be applicable. These sums would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay these sums within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The parties, furthermore, agreed that within the said three-month period the Government would pay, from their own funds, the sums awarded in the domestic decisions under consideration in the present case s (see table appended), less any amounts which may have already been paid on the basis of the said decisions, plus the costs of the domestic enforcement proceedings. These payments will constitute the final resolution of the cases pending before the European Court of Human Rights .

THE LAW

The Court considers that, in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules of Court, the applications should be joined, given their similar factual and legal background

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

Done in English and notified in writing on 23 April 2015 .

Marialena Tsirli Ján Šikuta Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application

no. and date of introduction

Applicant name

date of birth

nationality

Represented by

Final domestic decision details

(the seat of the relevant court and the date of the decision )

The date of the e nforcement order

11657/09

17/02/2009

Milun PAVLOVI Ć

21/07/1952

Serbian

_

Belgrade

12 July 2002

20/05/2003

70223/10

12/11/2010

Dragan DAMNJANOVIĆ

10/01/1953

Serbian

_

Å abac

17 May 2002

9/01/2012

74411/10

15/11/2010

Dragan TADIĆ

25/09/1959

Serbian

_

Å abac

16 October 2001

2/03/2012

75124/10

24/11/2010

Đorđe PJEVAC

27/12/1952

Serbian

_

Å abac

24 February 2004

12/03/2012

13502/11

20/12/2010

Miodrag STOŠIĆ

04/06/1949

Serbian

_

Å abac

1. 16 May 2001

2. 24 April 2003

3. 9 January 2004

1. 19/10/2004

2. 16/12/2011

3. 12/12/2011

25421/11

07/03/2011

Vladan TOPALOVIĆ

27/09/1956

Serbian

_

Å abac

20 October 2003

13/08/2007

60107/12

03/09/2012

Miloranka POPOVIĆ

22/08/1954

Serbian

Vesna CUKAVAC

Novi Pazar

1. 11/02/1998

2. 30/06/2004

1. 15/06/2004

2. 12/10/2004

50269/13

22/07/2013

Osman KOLAÅ INAC

20/08/1958

Serbian

Ramiza ĐAKOVAC

Novi Pazar

7 March 2007

21/05/2007

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255