Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

FIRONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 52856/10;19643/11;33488/11;70636/12;22095/13 • ECHR ID: 001-154755

Document date: April 21, 2015

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 2

FIRONOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 52856/10;19643/11;33488/11;70636/12;22095/13 • ECHR ID: 001-154755

Document date: April 21, 2015

Cited paragraphs only

FIRST SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 52856/10 Aleksandr Vladimirovich FIRONOV against Russia and 4 other applications (see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights ( First Section ), sitting on 21 April 2015 as a Committee composed of:

Khanlar Hajiyev , President, Julia Laffranque , Dmitry Dedov , judges, and André Wampach , Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on 22 August 2010 ,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

1. A list of the applicants and their representatives is set out in the appendix.

2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr G. Matyushkin, the Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights .

3. The applicants complained that their pre-trial detention had been unreasonably long and that it had not been based on relevant or sufficient reasons.

4. On 12 December 2013, 18 February 2014, 2 June 2014 and 1 October 2014, the applicants ’ complaints were communicated to the Russian Government.

5. By letters of 1 3 June, 23 September, 12 November and 2 December 2014 the Government informed the Cou rt that they proposed to make a unilateral declaration with a view to resolving the issue raised by the applications. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications in accordance with Article 37 of the Convention.

6. In that declaration, the Government acknowledged that all the applicants had been detained without “relevant and sufficient” grounds on the basis of decisions rendered by Russian courts which had not complied with the requirements of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention and stated their readiness to pay the following amounts to the applicants as just satisfaction:

(a) 1,450 euros (EUR) to Mr Fironov for his pre-trial detention “between 16 July 2009 and 23 September 2010” ( 1 year, 2 months, and 8 days ) ;

(b) EUR 1,050 to Mr Galimov for his pre-trial detention “between 21 September 2010 and 1 August 2011” ( 10 months and 10 days ) ;

(c) EUR 1,500 to Mr Smirnov for his pre-trial detention between “28 August 2010 and 2 4 November 2011” ( 1 year, 2 months, and 27 days);

(d) EUR 5,750 to Mr Koval for his pre-trial detention between “19 August 2009 and 22 May 2014” (4 years, 9 months, and 3 days); and

(e) EUR 4,450 to Mr Tomochinskiy for his pre-trial detention between “13 November 2010 and 26 July 2013” (2 years, 8 months, and 12 days).

7. The remainder of their declaration s provided as follows:

“The sum referred to above, which is to cover any pecuniary and non - pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

This payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.”

8. In their letters of different dates, the applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the Government ’ s declarations.

THE LAW

9. Having regard to the similarity of the main issues under the Convention in the above cases, the Court decides to join the applications and examine them in a single decision.

10. The Court considers that the applicants ’ agreement to the terms of the declarations made by the Government shall be considered as a friendly settlement between the parties (see Cēsnieks v. Latvia (dec.), no. 9278/06, § 34, 6 March 2012, and Bakal and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 8243/08, 5 June 2012).

11. The Court therefore takes note of the said friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications.

12. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications,

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

Done in English and notified in writing on 21 May 2015 .

André Wampach Khanlar Hajiyev Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No

Application No

Lodged on

Applicant

Date of birth

Place of residence

Represented by

52856/10

22/08/2010

Aleksandr Vladimirovich FIRONOV

26/09 /1980

Ufa,

Bashkortostan Republic

19643/11

16/03/2011

Lenar Ziganshevich GALIMOV

22/07/1982

Kazan ,

Tatarstan Republic

33488/11

06/05/2011

Aleksandr Sergeyevich SMIRNOV

07/01/1993

Galich,

Kostroma Region

Anatoliy Yuryevich YABLOKOV

Moscow

70636/12

01/10/2012

Aleksey Mikhaylovich KOVAL

27/06/1977

Ivanovo,

Ivanovo Region

22095/13

11/02/2013

Sergey Anatolyevich TOMOCHINSKIY

28/05/1987

Biysk, Altay Region

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846