ZENGİN v. TURKEY
Doc ref: 41585/10 • ECHR ID: 001-159887
Document date: December 8, 2015
- 0 Inbound citations:
- •
- 0 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 1 Outbound citations:
SECOND SECTION
DECISION
Application no . 41585/10 OÄŸuz ZENGÄ°N against Turkey
The European Court of Human Rights ( Second Section ), sitting on 8 December 2015 as a Committee composed of:
Paul Lemmens , President, Ksenija Turković , Jon Fridrik Kjølbro , judges,
and Abel Campos , Deputy Section Registrar ,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 1 June 2010,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The applicant, Mr Oğuz Zengin , is a Turkish national, who was born in 1957 and lives in Istanbul. He was represented before the Court by Ms Ş. Turan Dündar , a lawyer practising in Istanbul . The Turkish Government (“the Government”) w ere represented by their Agent.
Relying on Articles 6, 11 and 13 of the Convention, the applicant alleged that he was given a disciplinary penalty for taking part in a demonstration and complained further of a lack of a domestic remedy to challenge the impugned disciplinary measure.
On 5 August 2015 and 17 August 2015 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Turkey in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay him ex gratia 500 euros (EUR) to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and EUR 500 for costs and expenses, which will be converted into the national currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
THE LAW
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.
Done in English and notified in writing on 7 January 2016 .
Abel Campos Paul Lemmens Deputy Registrar President