THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 33050/07 Ulukbek ISHMETOV against Russia

The European Court of Human Rights ( Third Section ), sitting on 30 August 2016 as a Committee composed of:

Branko Lubarda , President, Pere Pastor Vilanova , Georgios A. Serghides , judges,

and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 29 May 2007 ,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant, Mr Ulukbek Ishmetov , is a Russian national, who was born in 1924 and lives in Vladivostok .

The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G. Matyus h kin , Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights .

The applicant complained under Article s 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention about the failure by the national authorities to enforce final court decision in his favour , and about the lack of an effective remedy against the non ‑ enforcement of the judgment i n his favour .

On 3 November 2008 the Court decided to give notice of the above application to the Government , and the parties submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits.

On 9 October 2014 the Court informed the applicant that his case fell within the scope of the pilot judgment Gerasimov and Others v. Russia (nos. 29920/05 and 10 others, 1 July 2014), and that the Court had thus adjourned the adversarial proceedings in the applicant ’ s case until 1 October 2016.

On 8 February 2016 the Government informed the Court about the applicant ’ s death on 18 December 2013.

On 26 February 201 6 a letter was sent to the applicant ’ s address by registered post enquiring whether any heirs or close family members wished to pursue the proceedings in respect of Mr Ishmetov and asking to reply by 15 April 2016. The letter was returned for having been “unclaimed” (the time-limit for storage had expired).

THE LAW

It has been the Court ’ s practice to strike applications out of the list of cases under Article 37 § 1 of the Convention in the absence of any heir or close relative who has expressed the wis h to pursue an application (see Léger v. France (striking out) [GC], no. 19324/02 , § 44 , 30 March 2009 with further references). From the developments set out above it appears that the applicant died in the course of the proceedings. No heirs or close relatives have expressed the wish to pursue the application on his behalf. As the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights which require the continued examination of the case (contrast Karner v. Austria , no. 40016/98, §§ 24 ‑ 28, ECHR 2003 ‑ IX), it considers it appropriate to strike the application out of its list of cases under Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention .

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 22 September 2016 .

FatoÅŸ Aracı Branko Lubarda              Deputy Registrar President