Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

SHAFRAY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 36108/10, 55232/10, 55601/10, 67588/11, 35064/14, 38036/14, 45483/14, 63817/14, 74590/14, 18199/15, ... • ECHR ID: 001-167539

Document date: September 15, 2016

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

SHAFRAY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 36108/10, 55232/10, 55601/10, 67588/11, 35064/14, 38036/14, 45483/14, 63817/14, 74590/14, 18199/15, ... • ECHR ID: 001-167539

Document date: September 15, 2016

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 36108/10 Boris Samuilovich SHAFRAY against Russia and 12 other applications (see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 15 September 2016 as a Committee composed of:

Helena Jäderblom, President, Dmitry Dedov, Branko Lubarda, judges,

and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants ’ replies to these declarations,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) . In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

The Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications.

The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants ’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.

The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

The Court finds that, following the applicants ’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list insofar as they relate to the inadequate conditions of detention .

The applicant in case no. 45483/14 also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention. The Court has examined these complaints and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.

It follows that this part of application no. 45483/14 must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention insofar as they concern the inadequate conditions of detention ;

Declares the remainder of application no. 45483/14 inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 6 October 2016 .

Hasan Bakırcı Helena Jäderblom Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant name

Date of birth /

Date of registration

Representative name and location

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Date of receipt of Government ’ s declaration

Date of receipt of applicant ’ s acceptance

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses

per applicant

(in euros) [i]

36108/10

06/05/2010

Boris Samuilovich

SHAFRAY

06/10/1951

04/02/2016

27/07/2016

5,250

55232/10

11/08/2010

Andrey Aleksandrovich ODINTSOV

24/07/1972

04/02/2016

29/06/2016

3,500

55601/10

23/08/2010

Sergey Igorevich

ZYABKOV

31/12/1982

04/02/2016

06/07/2016

3,500

67588/11

21/09/2011

Vitaliy Pavlovich

VOROBYEV

19/11/1983

18/03/2016

08/07/2016

8,125

35064/14

15/10/2014

Nikolay Vasilyevich VASILYEV

17/11/1954

04/02/2016

01/07/2016

3,880

38036/14

11/08/2014

Vasiliy Aleksandrovich ANISIMOV

13/09/1981

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

18/03/2016

28/07/2016

6,875

45483/14

21/05/2015

Dmitriy Sergeyevich KLYKANOV

14/09/1978

18/03/2016

07/07/2016

11,875

63817/14

27/10/2014

Eduard Nikolayevich DRUGOV

13/03/1977

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

04/02/2016

20/07/2016

4,155

74590/14

15/11/2014

Boris Vladimirovich DOSTOVALOV

06/08/1979

Denisov Vyacheslav Yuryevich

Novosibirsk

04/02/2016

12/07/2016

8,375

18199/15

07/04/2015

Viktor Vasilyevich

TRIFONOV

30/08/1984

Budkevich Tatyana Georgiyevna

Pervouralsk

04/02/2016

07/07/2016

7,375

26208/15

27/04/2015

Stanislav Nikolayevich BULATOV

06/10/1977

18/03/2016

13/07/2016

7,875

34121/15

17/06/2015

Olga Yevgenyevna

ZAGIROVA

04/09/1971

Vorotyntsev Dmitriy

Rostov-na-Donu

18/03/2016

01/07/2016

10,500

46215/15

10/09/2015

Arseniy Yuryevich MIROSHNICHENKO

13/01/1990

18/03/2016

21/07/2016

16,375

[i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255