Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

DEREVYANKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 31386/05;28938/06;50428/06;42025/07;18266/08;3469/10;74269/11 • ECHR ID: 001-168083

Document date: September 29, 2016

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

DEREVYANKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 31386/05;28938/06;50428/06;42025/07;18266/08;3469/10;74269/11 • ECHR ID: 001-168083

Document date: September 29, 2016

Cited paragraphs only

FIFTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 31386/05 Olga Andreyevna DEREVYANKO against Ukraine and 6 other applications (see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 29 September 2016 as a Committee composed of:

Khanlar Hajiyev, President, Faris Vehabović, Carlo Ranzoni, judges,

and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the parties,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicants and the relevant details of the application s are set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law were communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) . Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

A. Joinder of the applications

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

B. Complaints under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention ( excessive length of civil proceedings and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law )

The Court, having examined all the materials submitted to it and having regard to its case-law on the subject, considers that the applicants ’ complaints under this head are inadmissible for the following reasons: in application no. 74269/11 the proceedings in question concern neither the criminal charge against the applicant, nor his civil rights (see, mutatis mutandis , Garimpo v. Portugal , no. 66752/01, (dec.), 10 June 2004); applications nos. 18266/08 and 3469/10 were introduced out of time and in applications nos. 31386/05, 28938/06, 50428/06, and 42025/07 the length of the proceedings was not excessive or unreasonable.

In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1, 3 and 4 of the Convention.

C. Remaining complaints

Some applicants also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention.

The Court has examined the applications listed in the appended table and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.

It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention .

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Declares the application s inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 20 October 2016 .

Hasan Bakırcı Khanlar Hajiyev Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant name

Date of birth

Representative name and location

Start of proceedings

End of proceedings

Total length

Level of jurisdiction

31386/05

16/08/2005

Olga Andreyevna DEREVYANKO

09/04/1955

11/11/2002

20/12/2007

5 years, 1 month and 10 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

28938/06

05/07/2006

Viktor Mykolayovych KIRYANOV

01/01/1950

01/09/2000

25/10/2005

5 years, 1 month and 25 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

50428/06

12/10/2006

Svitlana Mykolayivna ZHELEZNOVA

28/10/1948

Applicant died on 21/12/2012.

Her husband, Stanislav Arsentiyovich ZHELEZNOV, has the quality of heir.

28/08/2001

30/12/2004

29/11/2006

14/03/2007

5 year s , 3 months and 2 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

2 years, 2 months and 15 day s

3 levels of jurisdiction

42025/07

25/09/2007

Viktor Vasilyevich SEVASTYANOV

06/08/1937

29/10/2001

04/07/2007

5 year s, 8 months and 6 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

18266/08

01/04/2008

Aleksey Valentinovich YANKOVSKIY

27/04/1975

11/09/1997

12/07/2007

9 years, 10 months and 2 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

3469/10

01/12/2009

Lidiya Yakovlevna NECHAY

10/09/1959

Sergey G ennadyevich Kozlov

Sevastopol

26/01/2001

31/05/2007

6 year s, 4 months and 6 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

74269/11

25/11/2011

Valentyn Vasylyovych BEREZYNETS

10/04/1944

12/09/2003

24/05/2011

7 years, 8 months and 13 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255