Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

ARSLAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 22575/05, 25307/05, 37714/05, 26677/06, 10912/07, 14111/07, 14118/07, 22257/07, 26229/07, 41318/07, ... • ECHR ID: 001-168923

Document date: October 11, 2016

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 10

ARSLAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

Doc ref: 22575/05, 25307/05, 37714/05, 26677/06, 10912/07, 14111/07, 14118/07, 22257/07, 26229/07, 41318/07, ... • ECHR ID: 001-168923

Document date: October 11, 2016

Cited paragraphs only

SECOND SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 22575/05 Bayram ARSLAN against Turkey and 47 other applications (see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 11 October 2016 as a Committee composed of:

Nebojša Vučinić, President, Valeriu Griţco, Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, judges, and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table ,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

THE FACTS

1. A list of the applicants and their representatives is set out in the appendix. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

A. The circumstances of the case

2. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

3. The applicants were all serving their prison sentences or were in pre-trial detention when the present applications were lodged. Disciplinary boards of respective prisons decided to impose on the applicants ’ correspondence several types of monitoring measures such as stopping, destroying or censoring their private letters.

4. The applicants challenged the prison authorities ’ decisions before the enforcement judges and the assize courts respectively. The domestic courts dismissed the applicants ’ objections and ruled that the impugned restrictions were consistent with the domestic laws and regulations and were justified by reasons of order and security in the prisons, prevention of offences and protection of third parties.

B. Relevant domestic law

5. A description of the domestic law regarding the new remedy introduced by Law no. 6384 can be found in Sayan v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 49460/11, §§ 6-12, 14 June 2016).

COMPLAINTS

6. The applicants invoked Articles 8, 9, 10 and/or 14 of the Convention and complained that the restrictions imposed on their correspondence breached, in a discriminatory manner, their right to respect for their correspondence solely or together with their right to freedom of thought and their right to free expression. Some of the applicants also invoked Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention and complained about the ineffectiveness and unfairness of the procedures before the national courts. Finally, based on the same facts some of the applicants invoked Articles 1, 3, 17 and 18 of the Convention, Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 3 of Protocol No.7.

THE LAW

7. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, at the outset the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

8. The Court will examine the applications solely from the standpoint of Article 8 of the Convention (see Asan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 38453/09, 30 August 2016).

9. The Government noted that pursuant to Law no. 6384 a new Compensation Commission had been established to deal with applications concerning the length of proceedings and the non-execution of judgments. They further noted that the competence of the Compensation Commission was subsequently enlarged by a decree adopted on 9 March 2016 to examine complaints relating to, among other things, the alleged breach of the right to respect for correspondence of detainees or convicted persons, on account of the prison administration ’ s refusal to receive or send letters or similar correspondence that are drafted in Turkish. Accordingly, they maintained that the applicants had not exhausted domestic remedies, as they had not made any application to the Compensation Commission.

10. The Court has examined similar applications against Turkey on several occasions and found a violation of Article 8 of the Convention on the grounds that the interference was not “in accordance with the law” (see Tan v. Turkey , no. 9460/03, §§ 24-26, 3 July 2007, and Tur v. Turkey , no. 13692/03, §§ 23-25, 11 June 2013) or was not “necessary in a democratic society” (see Fazıl Ahmet Tamer v. Turkey , no. 6289/02, §§ 54 ‑ 56, 5 December 2006, and Mehmet Nuri Özen v. Turkey , no. 37619/05, §§ 18-19, 2 February 2010).

11. Furthermore, the Court also notes that in its decision in the case of Ümmühan Kaplan (no. 24240/07, § 77, 20 March 2012), it stressed that it could nevertheless examine, under its normal procedure, applications of that type which had already been communicated to the Government. However, taking into account the Government ’ s objection with regard to the applicants ’ failure to make use of the new domestic remedy established by Law no. 6384, the Court reiterates its conclusion in the cases of Turgut and Others v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 4860/09, §§ 47-59, 26 March 2013), Çakır and Others v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 51274/07, § 6, 25 June 2013), Yöyler and Others v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 10783/07, §§ 11-13, 16 December 2014), Yıldız and Yanak ((dec.), no. 44013/07, § 29-38, 27 May 2014), and Sayan v. Turkey ((dec.), no. 49460/11, 14 June 2016).

12. In view of the above, the Court concludes that the applications should be rejected under Article 35 §§ 1 and 4 of the Convention for non ‑ exhaustion of domestic remedies.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Declares the applications inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 17 November 2016 .

Hasan Bakırcı NebojÅ¡a Vučinić              Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application No.

Lodged on

Applicant

Date of birth

Place of residence

Represented by

22575/05

30/05/2005

Bayram ARSLAN

31/03/1972

Ordu

25307/05

27/06/2005

Tekin TANGÃœN

01/05/1969

TekirdaÄŸ

Taylan TANAY

37714/05

29/09/2005

Serhat ÇETİNER

23/10/1972

Kırıkkale

Sertaç ÇETİNER

26677/06

25/05/2006

Turgut KOYUNCU

10/10/1974

Ä°zmir

Hesin DURSUN

10912/07

19/02/2007

Mehmet Şerif ÖNER

01/01/1975

Ä°zmir

Türkan ASLAN

14111/07

13/03/2007

Kemal YİĞİT

20/10/1982

Ä°zmir

Esin ASLAN

14118/07

13/03/2007

Murat IÅžIK

01/01/1979

Ä°zmir

Nezahat PAÅžA BAYRAKTAR

22257/07

15/05/2007

Eren YILDIZ

01/01/1973

Edirne

Fazıl Ahmet TAMER

26229/07

05/06/2007

Süleyman TATAR

02/04/1970

Ankara

Fazıl Ahmet TAMER

41318/07

09/08/2007

Kemal YİĞİT

20/10/1982

Ä°zmir

Esin ASLAN

47146/07

09/10/2007

Cengiz Sinan Halis ÇELİK

16/04/1974

MuÄŸla

Ercan KANAR

49409/07

25/10/2007

Mustafa ÇAÇAN

01/01/1973

Diyarbakır

10000/08

18/02/2008

Hüseyin AYYILDIZ

01/01/1966

Istanbul

10367/08

23/01/2008

Hikmet KALE

08/12/1970

TekirdaÄŸ

Hasan ŞAHİNGÖZ

10/10/1971

TekirdaÄŸ

Gülizar TUNCER

13804/08

19/02/2008

Kemal YİĞİT

20/10/1982

Ä°zmir

Esin ASLAN

15645/08

10/03/2008

Kamuran ReÅŸit BEKÄ°R

01/01/1971

Ankara

Fahriye Belgün BABA

19169/08

31/03/2008

Erdener DEMÄ°REL

21/11/1980

TekirdaÄŸ

Metin FÄ°LORÄ°NALI

19639/08

01/04/2008

Hayati KAYTAN

01/05/1968

Ankara

20071/08

15/04/2008

Cebbar PALABIYIK

29/09/1969

Ankara

26976/08

02/05/2008

Murat KARAYEL

10/05/1971

Kırıkkale

Fazıl Ahmet TAMER

42121/08

15/05/2008

Nedim ÖZALP

01/04/1963

Bolu

Murat VARGÃœN

42692/08

26/08/2008

Sinan Ä°YÄ°T

06/11/1973

Ankara

Murat VARGÃœN

42701/08

13/06/2007

Fermani ÇETİN

01/03/1972

Bolu

42709/08

09/11/2007

Ä°brahim ÅžAHÄ°N

01/05/1975

Kocaeli

Gül ALTAY

42717/08

16/05/2007

Resul DEMÄ°R

02/02/1974

Bitlis

50594/08

31/10/2006

Serhat ÇETİNER

23/10/1972

Kırıkkale

Sertaç ÇETİNER

56246/08

22/08/2008

Cahit Ä°LBOÄžA

20/06/1973

Erzurum

Abdullah GÃœZEL

56361/08

30/10/2008

Turgut KOYUNCU

10/10/1974

Ä°zmir

Hesin DURSUN

60855/08

03/12/2008

Barış İNAN

05/02/1973

Kandıra

Faruk Nafiz ERTEKÄ°N

3812/09

25/11/2008

Mehmet YAVUZ

11/02/1969

Ä°zmir

5495/09

03/11/2008

Mehmet Åžirin TEKMENÃœRAY

02/05/1970

Karaman

Ömer GÜNEŞ

5883/09

05/03/2008

Mehmet Åžirin TEKMENÃœRAY

02/05/1970

Karaman

Ömer GÜNEŞ

6160/09

16/02/2009

Muhammed ÅžORLÄ°

01/01/1987

TekirdaÄŸ

Ä°nan AKMEÅžE

6567/09

24/01/2009

Mehmet Emin ERSOY

22/02/1967

Erzurum

6798/09

02/12/2008

Mehmet Çelebi ÇALAN

01/09/1967

Bolu

Murat VARGÃœN

6804/09

25/11/2008

Ömer YILDIRIM

01/05/1962

Karaman

9942/09

28/10/2008

Ali Ä°hsan DOST

20/11/1974

Ä°zmir

Hesin DURSUN

10771/09

31/12/2008

Mehmet Åžirin TEKMENÃœRAY

02/05/1970

Karaman

Ömer GÜNEŞ

11457/09

31/03/2004

Mehmet ReÅŸit ARSLAN

01/06/1966

Ankara

11550/09

06/12/2006

Mehmet Åžirin TEKMENÃœRAY

02/05/1970

Karaman

Ömer GÜNEŞ

12864/09

12/02/2009

Musa ÖZER

01/07/1968

Osmaniye

13910/09

23/02/2009

Tekin Ä°REZ

14/06/1968

Balıkesir

16962/09

18/03/2009

Mehmet Nuri ÖZEN

10/05/1976

Ä°zmir

Murat VARGÃœN

18149/09

17/03/2009

Ali ADIMAN

03/03/1965

Bolu

29165/09

29/04/2009

Musa KAYA

05/05/1973

Kırıkkale

33508/09

25/05/2009

Musa KAYA

05/05/1973

Kırıkkale

50108/09

16/07/2009

Giyasettin AYDIN

15/12/1972

Kırıkkale

Emel SAYIN

25958/15

29/03/2006

Soydan AKAY

20/01/1974

Diyarbakır

Canan CENGİZ ORUÇ

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255