Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

CHUGUNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 21412/11;24139/12;54324/12;55785/12;20189/14;68950/14;947/15;1309/15 • ECHR ID: 001-169749

Document date: November 17, 2016

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

CHUGUNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 21412/11;24139/12;54324/12;55785/12;20189/14;68950/14;947/15;1309/15 • ECHR ID: 001-169749

Document date: November 17, 2016

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 21412/11 Ivan Dmitriyevich CHUGUNOV against Russia and 7 other applications (see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 17 November 2016 as a Committee composed of:

Helena Jäderblom, President, Dmitry Dedov, Branko Lubarda, judges,

and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases, and the applicants ’ replies to these declarations,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention concerning the inadequate conditions of detention were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”) . In some of the applications, complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

After unsuccessful friendly-settlement negotiations, the Government submitted declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by these complaints. They further requested the Court to strike out the applications.

The Government acknowledged the inadequate conditions of detention. In some of the applications, they further acknowledged that the domestic authorities had violated the applicants ’ rights guaranteed by other provisions of the Convention. They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the applications out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention. The amounts would be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.

The applicants informed the Court that they agreed to the terms of the declarations.

THE LAW

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

The Court finds that, following the applicants ’ express agreement to the terms of the declaration made by the Government, the cases should be treated as a friendly settlement between the parties.

It therefore takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify the continued examination of the applications.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list .

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention .

Done in English and notified in writing on 8 December 2016 .

Hasan Bakırcı Helena Jäderblom              Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application no. Date of introduction

Applicant name

Date of birth

Representative name and location

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Date of receipt of Government ’ s declaration

Date of receipt of applicant ’ s acceptance

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses

per applicant

(in euros) [i]

21412/11

08/03/2011

Ivan Dmitriyevich CHUGUNOV

15/12/1984

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

15/03/2016

25/07/2016

15,250

24139/12

19/03/2012

Aleksandr Vitalyevich ANUFRIYEV

14/07/1990

Balyshev Viktor Viktorovich

Uvelskiy

15/03/2016

07/07/2016

9,000

54324/12

26/06/2012

Ivan Vladimirovich KABANOV

19/01/1983

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention

15/03/2016

05/08/2016

6,125

55785/12

27/07/2012

Igor Stanislavovich GARAYCHUK

11/10/1969

15/03/2016

08/09/2016

21,500

20189/14

10/02/2014

Sergey Valeryevich VOLZHANKIN

14/07/1979

15/03/2016

13/07/2016

15,000

68950/14

20/10/2014

Oleg Viktorovich SUKHOCHEV

26/03/1963

Churkina Lyudmila Mikhaylovna

Yekaterinburg

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law

15/03/2016

09/08/2016

13,250

947/15

19/02/2015

Ivan Sergeyevich YULYMOV

04/07/1995

15/03/2016

19/07/2016

4,805

1309/15

27/12/2014

Denis Valeryevich KHLEBNIKOV

17/12/1976

Boychenko Mariya Viktorovna

Velikiy Novgorod

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in respect of inadequate conditions of detention -

15/03/2016

27/07/2016

8,875

[i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255