Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

DYOMINA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 56042/07;753/08;9851/08;20369/08;59448/08;8649/09;18435/09;48227/10;74637/10;63025/15 • ECHR ID: 001-170471

Document date: December 15, 2016

  • Inbound citations: 0
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 1

DYOMINA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

Doc ref: 56042/07;753/08;9851/08;20369/08;59448/08;8649/09;18435/09;48227/10;74637/10;63025/15 • ECHR ID: 001-170471

Document date: December 15, 2016

Cited paragraphs only

FIFTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 56042/07 Mariya Petrovna DYOMINA against Ukraine and 9 other applications (see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 15 December 2016 as a Committee composed of:

Khanlar Hajiyev, President, Faris Vehabović, Carlo Ranzoni, judges,

and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,

Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by some of the applicants,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The list of applicant s and the relevant details of the application s are set out in the appended table.

The applicants ’ complaints under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings and the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law were communicated to the Ukrainian Government (“the Government”) . Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

A. Joinder of the applications

Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

B. Complaints under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention ( excessive length of civil proceedings and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law )

The Court, having examined all the materials submitted to it and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see, for example, Yuryeva and Yuryev v. Ukraine , no. 3431/03, § 43, 31 July 2012) , considers that the applicants ’ complaints under this head are inadmissible since the length of the proceedings was not excessive or unreasonable. It further notes that in applications nos. 9851/08, 48227/10 and 63025/15 the applicants ’ complaints have been introduced out of time.

In view of the above, the Court finds that these complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 1, 3 and 4 of the Convention.

C. Remaining complaints

Some applicants also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.

The Court has examined the applications listed in the appended table and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.

It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention .

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Declares the application s inadmissible.

Done in English and notified in writing on 12 January 2017 .

Hasan Bakırcı Khanlar Hajiyev              Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention

( excessive length of civil proceedings and lack of any effective remedy in domestic law)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant name

Date of birth

Start of proceedings

End of proceedings

Total length

Level of jurisdiction

56042/07

04/12/2007

Mariya Petrovna DYOMINA

01/01/1929

02/02/2003

29/01/2008

4 years, 11 months and 28 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

753/08

29/11/2007

Valeriy Nikolayevich BONDAR

26/04/1954

31/07/2001

10/02/2003

31/10/2002

04/07/2007

1 year, 3 months and 1 day

3 levels of jurisdiction

4 years, 4 months and 25 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

9851/08

19/02/2008

Mykola Vasylyovych MAZURKEVYCH

14/06/1941

11/09/1997

26/02/2004

6 years, 5 months and 16 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

20369/08

12/04/2008

Valentyna Vasylivna LUKIYENKO

28/03/1982

30/11/2001

19/06/2006

14/05/2002

09/02/2008

5 months and 15 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

1 year, 7 months and 22 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

59448/08

22/11/2008

Boguslav Stanislavovych SKOKOVSKYY

27/05/1952

26/09/2002

02/06/2008

5 years, 8 months and 8 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

8649/09

04/02/2009

Petro Ivanovych YAREMA

26/06/1960

19/02/2003

11/12/2008

5 years, 9 months and 23 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

18435/09

27/02/2009

Lidiya Panteleyevna DERKACH

01/07/1950

21/01/2002

18/05/2007

5 years, 3 months and 28 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

48227/10

07/08/2010

Mykola Pavlovych LOZOVYY

15/05/1947

20/06/2002

29/10/2008

6 years, 4 months and 10 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

74637/10

07/12/2010

Svitlana Oleksandrivna BUDYNSKA

19/08/1938

31/05/2006

09/06/2010

4 years and 10 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

63025/15

20/01/2016

Oleg Oleksandrovych VITYUTNEV

30/03/1975

01/02/2008

21/05/2015

7 years, 3 months and 21 days

3 levels of jurisdiction

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2024
Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 398107 • Paragraphs parsed: 43931842 • Citations processed 3409255