Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

PUKELIS v. LITHUANIA

Doc ref: 2052/10 • ECHR ID: 001-173556

Document date: April 4, 2017

  • Inbound citations: 1
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

PUKELIS v. LITHUANIA

Doc ref: 2052/10 • ECHR ID: 001-173556

Document date: April 4, 2017

Cited paragraphs only

FOURTH SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 2052/10 Arūnas PUKELIS against Lithuania

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 4 April 2017 as a Committee composed of:

Vincent A. De Gaetano, President, Egidijus Kūris , Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer , judges,

and Andrea Tamietti, Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 29 December 2009,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

1. The applicant, Mr Arūnas Pukelis , is a Lithuanian national who was born in 1968 and lives in Vilnius.

2. The applicant ’ s complaint under Article 8 of the Convention, concerning the imposition of preventive measures on him on the basis of classified information, was communicated to the Government, who were represented by their Agent, Ms K. Bubnytė .

3. The applicant failed to respond to the Registry ’ s last letter of 20 December 2016 (he failed to claim the letter from the post office), reminding him that the period allowed for submission of his observations in reply had expired on 29 November 2016 and that no extension of time had been requested. His attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.

THE LAW

4. The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 4 May 2017 .

Andrea Tamietti Vincent A. De Gaetano              Deputy Registrar President

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846