Lexploria - Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Lexploria beta Legal research enhanced by smart algorithms
Menu
Browsing history:

DUBOVIKOV AND CHUPOV v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 57335/13;42645/14 • ECHR ID: 001-174077

Document date: May 2, 2017

  • Inbound citations: 3
  • Cited paragraphs: 0
  • Outbound citations: 0

DUBOVIKOV AND CHUPOV v. RUSSIA

Doc ref: 57335/13;42645/14 • ECHR ID: 001-174077

Document date: May 2, 2017

Cited paragraphs only

THIRD SECTION

DECISION

Application no s . 57335/13 and 42645/14 Dmitriy Alekseyevich DUBOVIKOV against Russia and Mikhail Vladimirovich CHUPOV against Russia (see list appended)

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 2 May 2017 as a Committee composed of:

Luis López Guerra, President, Dmitry Dedov, Jolien Schukking, judges,

and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above applications lodged on 13 August 2013 and 26 May 2014 respectively,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix.

The Russian Government (“the Government”) were initially represented by Mr G. Matyuskin, former Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights, and subsequently by Mr A. Fedorov, Head of the Office of the Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights.

The applicants ’ complaints under Article 3 of the Convention on account of their confinement in a metal cage during the criminal proceedings against them and the complaint by Mr M. Chupov under Article 3 of the Convention on account of his handcuffing during the pronouncement of the judgment were communicated to the Government, who submitted their observations on the admissibility and merits. The observations were forwarded to the applicants, who were invited to submit their own observations. No reply was received to the Registry ’ s letter.

By letters dated 4 July 2016, sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired on 13 May 2016 and that no extension of time had been requested. The applicants ’ attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicant does not intend to pursue the application. No response has been received.

THE LAW

The Court considers that the applications should be joined and considered in a single decision.

The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases.

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.

Done in English and notified in writing on 24 May 2017 .

FatoÅŸ Aracı Luis López Guerra              Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

No.

Application No.

Lodged on

Applicant

Date of birth

Place of residence

Represented by

57335/13

13/08/2013

Dmitriy Alekseyevich DUBOVIKOV

20/03/1985

Revda

42645/14

26/05/2014

Mikhail Vladimirovich CHUPOV

27/03/1973

Moscow

Vadim Valentinovich LOGINOV

© European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026

LEXI

Lexploria AI Legal Assistant

Active Products: EUCJ + ECHR Data Package + Citation Analytics • Documents in DB: 401132 • Paragraphs parsed: 45279850 • Citations processed 3468846