SECOND SECTION

DECISION

Application no . 37920/11 Ana TANASA against Turkey

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 16 May 2017 as a Committee composed of:

Julia Laffranque, President, Jon Fridrik Kjølbro, Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, judges,

and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar ,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 29 March 2011,

Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

The applicant, Ms Ana Tanasa, is a Romanian national, who was born in 1971 and lives in Istanbul. She was represented before the Court by Ms S.N. Yılmaz and Mr A. Yılmaz, lawyers practising in Istanbul.

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

The applicant complained under Article 3, Article 5 §§ 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 and Article 13 of the Convention about the alleged poor conditions of detention at the Aksaray police station, the alleged unlawfulness of her detention, not being brought before a judge following her apprehension by the police, the absence of communication of information on the reasons for her detention as well as the alleged absence of effective remedies to challenge the lawfulness of her detention and to request compensation .

On 2 November 2016 the Court received the following declaration signed by the Government:

“I declare that the Government of Turkey offer to pay ex gratia to Ms Ana Tanasa, with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights, 10,000 (ten thousand) euros to cover any and all pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.

The Government acknowledge that the detention of the applicant, the absence of communication of information to the applicant on the reasons for her detention, the absence of effective remedies to challenge the lawfulness of her detention and to request compensation amounted to a breach of the applicant ’ s rights protected by the Convention (see Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey , no. 30471/08, 22 September 2009).

This sum will be converted into the local currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court to strike the case out of its list of cases. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.”

On 6 March 2017 the Court received the following declaration signed by one of the representatives of the applicant:

“I, Sümeyye Nur Yılmaz, note that the Government of Turkey are prepared to pay ex gratia to Ms Ana Tanasa, with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case pending before the European Court of Human Rights, 10,000 (ten thousand euros) to cover any and all pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant.

The Government acknowledge that the detention of the applicant, the absence of communication of information to the applicant on the reasons for her detention, the absence of effective remedies to challenge the lawfulness of her detention and to request compensation amounted to a breach of the applicant ’ s rights protected by the Convention (see Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey , no. 30471/08, 22 September 2009, and Yarashonen v. Turkey , no. 72710/11, 24 June 2014).

This sum will be converted into the local currency at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court to strike the case out of its list of cases. From the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Having consulted the applicant, I would inform you that she accepts the proposal and waive any further claims against Turkey in respect of the facts giving rise to this application. She declares that this constitutes a final resolution of the case.”

THE LAW

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

Done in English and notified in writing on 15 June 2017 .

Hasan Bakırcı Julia Laffranque              Deputy Registrar President