CÖMERT AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Doc ref: 17027/06 • ECHR ID: 001-177470
Document date: September 5, 2017
- 0 Inbound citations:
- •
- 0 Cited paragraphs:
- •
- 0 Outbound citations:
SECOND SECTION
DECISION
Application no . 17027/06 Hamza CÖMERT and others against Turkey
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 5 September 2017 as a Committee composed of:
Julia Laffranque , President , Paul Lemmens, Valeriu Griţco , judges ,
and Hasan Bakırcı, Deputy Section Registrar ,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 April 2006,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
1. A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix. They were represented before the Court by Mr Gökhan Nurtin , Ms B. Işın Yıldırım and Mr Gencer Hazır , lawyers practicing in Ankara. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.
2. The applicants, who were employed by the İslâhiye Municipality (the municipality), were either dismissed or were retired . They subsequently brought separate actions before domestic courts, claiming their outstanding salaries, dismissal indemnities, severance pay and/or other pecuniary rights.
3. The domestic courts ordered the municipality to pay certain amounts favouring the applicants ’ claims. However, when the application was lodged with the Court, the applicants had still not been paid the outstanding amounts in full.
4. The case was communicated to the Government under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention.
5. Following the communication of the case, by a letter dated 23 February 2017, the applicants ’ representative was requested to submit further factual information. In particular, he was invited to inform the Court about the outcome of the proceedings before the Compensation Commission, set up by Law no. 6384 of 9 January 2013. The representative ’ s attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike a case out of its list of cases where the circumstances lead to the conclusion that the applicants do not intend to pursue the application.
6. According to the information obtained from the official website of the Turkish Postal Service, on 3 March 2017 the letter was delivered to the applicants ’ representative. However, no response has been received.
THE LAW
The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 28 September 2017 .
Hasan Bakırcı Julia Laffranque Deputy Registrar President
Appendix
N o .
First name
LAST NAME
Birth date
Place of residence
Hamza CÖMERT
04/03/1942
Gaziantep
Halil ASLAN
01/01/1959
Gaziantep
Ömer ATEŞ
01/01/1960
Gaziantep
Şıh Mehmet AYAZ
01/01/1961
Gaziantep
Hüseyin ÇALIK
01/01/1960
Gaziantep
Ali DEM İ R
01/01/1945
Gaziantep
Erdal EROL
01/01/1971
Gaziantep
Ramazan GÖZEL
01/01/1965
Gaziantep
Ertaç HÜMAZ
26/03/1989
Gaziantep
Hasan HÜMAZ
02/03/1988
Gaziantep
Hatice HÜMAZ
01/01/1955
Gaziantep
Nurcan HÜMAZ
02/03/1988
Gaziantep
Sebaha İ NCEARIK
10/09/1978
Gaziantep
Ökkeş KAHRIMAN
01/01/1959
Gaziantep
Ökkeş KARADAŞ
01/01/1968
Gaziantep
Abdurrahman KAYA
01/01/1956
Gaziantep
Hikmet KORKUT
01/01/1961
Gaziantep
Hüseyin ŞENAVCI
01/01/1949
Gaziantep
Ökkeş SÖNMEZ
01/01/1962
Gaziantep
Serpil TAŞÇI
10/10/1980
Gaziantep
Kadir ÜM İ T
01/01/1960
Gaziantep