LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
Sorry, there was an error communicating with our API.
Try refreshing the page, and if the error persists, please try again in a few minutes.
NENICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Doc ref: 32802/09;17137/10;2543/12;44202/14 • ECHR ID: 001-179666
Document date: November 21, 2017
- Inbound citations: 4
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
NENICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Doc ref: 32802/09;17137/10;2543/12;44202/14 • ECHR ID: 001-179666
Document date: November 21, 2017
Cited paragraphs only
THIRD SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 32802/09 Oksana Yevgenyevna NENICH and others against Russia and 3 other applications (see list appended)
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 21 November 2017 as a Committee composed of:
Helen Keller, President, Pere Pastor Vilanova , Alena Poláčková , judges,
and Fatoş Aracı , Deputy Section Registrar ,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table ,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
A list of the applicants is set out in the appendix.
The applicants ’ complaints concerning the seizure of their passport were communicated to the Russian Government (“the Government”), who were represented initially by Mr G. Matyushkin , the Representative of the Russian Federation to the European Court of Human Rights, and then by his successor in that office, Mr M. Galperin .
The applicants failed to respond to the last Registry ’ s letter (see Annex for dates and details), reminding that the period allowed for submission of their observations in reply had expired on 3 November 2016 in respect of applications nos. 2543/12 and 44202/14 and on 4 January 2017 in respect of applications nos. 32802/09 and 17137/10 and that no extension of time had been requested. Their attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicants may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue their applications, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the cases.
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case s out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 14 December 2017 .
FatoÅŸ Aracı Helen Keller Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
No.
Application no.
Lodged on
Applicant
Date of birth
Place of residence
Details
32802/09
05/05/2009
Oksana Yevgenyevna Nenich
21/06/1973
Kolomna
Kseniya Sergeyevna Nenich
15/01/1995
Kolomna
Timofey Sergeyevich Osin
05/06/2004
Kolomna
The last Registry ’ s letter of 2 June 2017 was returned by the post services as unclaimed.
17137/10
16/03/2010
Angelina Robertovna Androsyan
21/12/1984
Moscow
The last Registry ’ s letter of 2 June 2017 was returned by the post services as unclaimed.
2543/12
26/12/2011
Yelena Borisovna Malygina
25/07/1969
Malino
Ilgam Azadovich Burnayev
02/09/1969
Malino village , Moscow Region
Represented by Ms R. Zakatova
The last Registry ’ s letter of 26 January 2017 was received by the applicants ’ representative on 15 February 2017. The applicants failed to respond.
44202/14
05/09/2014
Irina Nikolayevna Staretskaya
03/07/1972
Sergiyevskaya village, Krasnodar Region
The last Registry ’ s letter of 26 January 2017 was received by the applicant on 18 February 2017. The applicant failed to respond.
© European Union,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu, 1998 - 2026
