VENUS PROJECT SLOVAKIA, S.R.O. AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
Doc ref: 58982/16;29335/17;33395/17 • ECHR ID: 001-179640
Document date: November 23, 2017
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 1
THIRD SECTION
DECISION
Application no. 58982/16 VENUS PROJECT SLOVAKIA, S.R.O. against Slovakia and 2 other applications (see appended table)
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 23 November 2017 as a Committee composed of:
Luis López Guerra, President, Dmitry Dedov, Jolien Schukking, judges,
and Liv Tigerstedt, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above applications lodged on the various dates indicated in the appended table,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the cases,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
The list of applicants is set out in the appended table.
The applicants ’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Government of the Slovak Republic (“the Government”) .
The Court received friendly-settlement declarations under which the applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Slovakia in respect of the facts giving rise to these applications, subject to an undertaking by the Government to pay them the amounts detailed in the appended table. These amounts will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court ’ s decision. In the event of failure to pay these amounts within the above-mentioned three-month period, the Government undertake to pay simple interest on them, from the expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
THE LAW
Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention .
Done in English and notified in writing on 14 December 2017 .
Liv Tigerstedt Luis López Guerra Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
(excessive length of civil proceedings)
No.
Application no. Date of introduction
Applicant name
Date of birth /
Date of registration
Representative name and location
Date of receipt of Government declaration
Date of receipt of Applicant ’ s declaration
Amount offered by the Government for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses
per applicant
(in euros) [i]
58982/16
03/10/2016
VENUS PROJECT Slovakia, s.r.o.
12/02/1993
Emília Korčeková
Pezinok
10/10/2017
0 4/10/2017
2,900
29335/17
10/04/2017
Branislav Adamčo
06/07/1978
Jozef Sabó
Sečovce
10/10/2017
29/08/2017
1,000
33395/17
26/04/2017
Peter Laduna
26/02/1973
10/10/2017
18/07/2017
1,600
[i] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
