KŁODZIŃSKI v. POLAND
Doc ref: 26857/10 • ECHR ID: 001-180099
Document date: December 12, 2017
- Inbound citations: 0
- •
- Cited paragraphs: 0
- •
- Outbound citations: 0
FIRST SECTION
DECISION
Application no . 26857/10 Dawid KŁODZIŃSKI against Poland
The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 12 December 2017 as a Committee composed of:
Aleš Pejchal , President, Krzysztof Wojtyczek , Armen Harutyunyan , judges, and Renata Degener, Deputy Section Registrar ,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 6 May 2010,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
1. The applicant, Mr Dawid Kłodziński , is a Polish national, who was born in 1983 and lived in Bydgoszcz.
2. The applicant ’ s complaint about the length of the criminal proceedings against him (Article 6 § 1 of the Convention) was communicated to the Polish Government, who were represented by their Agent, Ms J. Chrzanowska , of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
3. The communication letter of 27 July 2015, sent to the address provided by the applicant, has been returned undelivered with an annotation on the envelope “the addressee moved out”. By the letter of 11 December 2015, sent by registered post, the applicant was invited to inform the Registry whether he wished to pursue his application, by 11 January 2016, and his attention was drawn to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. This letter was also returned undelivered. The last Registry ’ s letter of 17 December 2015, sent by registered post, inviting him to submit any comments on the Government ’ s unilateral declaration, was also returned undelivered.
4. The applicant has not kept any contact with the Court since his last letter from May 2012.
THE LAW
5. The Court considers that, in these circumstances, the applicant may be regarded as no longer wishing to pursue his application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine , the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of the case.
6. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court, unanimously,
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Done in English and notified in writing on 11 January 2018 .
Renata Degener Aleš Pejchal Deputy Registrar President
LEXI - AI Legal Assistant
